G
galumay
Guest
Technically it may well have been illegal, but I doubt any referee in the world would've awarded the penalty. The only time I can recall teams being penalised for incorrect halfback positioning was way back when they first brought the law in. I, personally, had forgotten about it and I wouldn't be surprised if professional referees had as well.
I also believe that TMO's cannot rule on set plays. Ergo using replays wouldn't be an option, thus making it a split-second on-field call.
Not so sure about that, referees not infrequently warn the potential receiver/halfback about their posistioning - join the line out or get back.
The law says the receiver has to be 2m back from the linout, (or 2.5m from the LoT.) When I looked at it in more detail its pretty clear to me its borderline, as the ball leaves the hands McCaw is in the process of coming across the 2.5m line - but it would be a question of 100ths of a second so I would let that go.
No doubt the player was lifted prior to the throw, but again it was fractions of a second early, in real time it looks ok.
Importantly the all important question of material impact has to be asked as a pro referee, neither the lifted player nor McCaw's positioning had a material impact, the impact was created by SA's abject failure to mark McCaw, they obviously thought he was a decoy.
So taken all in all I reckon it was a fair call by the ref.