Blue, was the previous scrum with the two TH's packing down though?
You mean two bok TH's? No it was Beast and Koch. They got a penalty. I think the next scrum They got a lot of go forward and Schalk picked up from the back. Then there was another knock on and Koch had to go off with blood.
I think.
I have just lost a lot of rerspect for the Boks, uncontested scrums FFS!!
McCaw past it? Yeah..right
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Damn McCaw is a beast. It's not just the number of break-downs he gets to but how many times he is the first or second player there - just a beast!
Ben Franks: 13! ruck involvements in less than 20 minutes. Our starting front row would consider those stats good for a whole game.
He is often a much maligned player, but the guy has for the past couple of years been a superb impact off the bench because he just hits ruck after ruck with some decent force. He's a penalty waiting to happen some times, but he does have provide that spark through his ruck work in the final quarter.
To be fair my grandma could've scored that if she just knew what the plan was. But I never thought he was past it to begin with. Utter bollocks.
I've rated him pretty highly for the last 2 years, gets through heaps of work and put on a hit.
I think I'd take him over his brother to be honest.
Isn't the rule in lineouts that if the halfback enters someone in the line must exit? Or is the ruling that the hooker had already thrown the ball before mccaw started his run in?
Your comment got lost a bit in the discussion about the scrums, but McCaw's try was probably illegal on two counts. It seems to me the ABs always have a few 'secret' plays like this that they can pull out of the hat in desperate situations.
I think its one of the ways they win the close ones. No team is better in the world at playing at the edge of the laws and taking advantage of any refereeing inexperience or interpretations.