the plastic paddy
John Solomon (38)
No he doesn't. Nothing shown to anyone and a facile win. Murray just gets better and better. Best scrum half in the world now and still only 25.Schmidt needs to go to plan b
No he doesn't. Nothing shown to anyone and a facile win. Murray just gets better and better. Best scrum half in the world now and still only 25.Schmidt needs to go to plan b
Jebus KevinO, how much did you have on? Must have been some puck up.And have the scorecast of Murray and Ireland by 21-30 at 100/1 so that's enough scores
No he doesn't. Nothing shown to anyone and a facile win. Murray just gets better and better. Best scrum half in the world now and still only 25.
In the good ol days he'd have had a good shoeing for doing that.How did Nigel Owens miss that Scottish player hanging onto peoples legs in a maul?
He has out played him on a couple of occasions now. Smith rarely has to be an auxillary flanker as well. Put simply, Murray is better playing for Ireland than Smith would be and would be better sat in his armchair playing for NZ than Smith is.*cough* Aaron Smith *cough*
Murray is good, but I don't think he is the best SH.
He was the tackler, can hold on as long as he wants until he gets kicked off as long as the man is on his feet.In the good ol days he'd have had a good shoeing for doing that.
He has out played him on a couple of occasions now. Smith rarely has to be an auxillary flanker as well. Put simply, Murray is better playing for Ireland than Smith would be and would be better sat in his armchair playing for NZ than Smith is.
I know that there are plenty of kiwis who disagree with you very strongly.I agree Murray might well be better for Ireland than Smith, but I don't think he would be better than Smith is behind the NZ pack. They both suit their respective teams very well.
I know that there are plenty of kiwis who disagree with you very strongly.
Smith is not quite so clever when his pack is going backwards. Not his fault, he has rarely played behind one that is. Murray has and that is why he is the best SH in the world. What he would do sat behind the NZ pack does not even bare thinking about for those of us who do not live on the dark side. Anyway, tis all supposition. If any of the pricks in charge of French teams is reading this Murray is absolute horse shit as a player, not a team player and prone to injury.Well fair enough, but lets agree to disagree. I like the pace and zip that Smith brings to a game. Don't get me wrong Murray is a very fine scrummie. Walk into a Lions team right now.
I presume you mean Ford, but yes you're 100% right. I wouldn't even have Farrell on the bench. Cipriani is just a plain better player and Myler is a better Farrell type player than Farrell. No international experience though.
Smith is not quite so clever when his pack is going backwards. Not his fault, he has rarely played behind one that is. Murray has and that is why he is the best SH in the world. What he would do sat behind the NZ pack does not even bare thinking about for those of us who do not live on the dark side. Anyway, tis all supposition. If any of the pricks in charge of French teams is reading this Murray is absolute horse shit as a player, not a team player and prone to injury.
Problem for England is consistency though, or lack thereof . They rarely seem to string a good run of games together. Every chance that they'll go down to Scotland or get blown away by the Irish.
Murray was sublime today. There is not a team on earth he wouldn't waltz into, including NZ.
Murray was sublime today. There is not a team on earth he wouldn't waltz into, including NZ.