formerflanker
Ken Catchpole (46)
I don't know who was more amateur - Manly or the broadcast.
Both need to improve massively for this experiment to succeed.
Both need to improve massively for this experiment to succeed.
Gordon up 66-0 against Manly - flicking through a few club games on Stan. Only close game really Easts vs Southern Districts. All other games are blow outs.
Just teething problems.What on earth is happening at the Village Green?
Undoubtedly. But in their early stages they only had one game a week on FTA. As their national competitions developed, so did the tv coverage. There is no way that we could bridge that gap just by having a game on FTA in NSW only. Have to start somewhere.
Black and white too, until 1975 or so.In the beginning there was no Pay TV, No digital channels. just 3 commercial stations and the ABC.
I do think we are at a good starting point to grow the comp with all games broadcast on Stan. Just need to spread the talent evenly and stop the lopsided results. An even comp will attract more eyes more quickly.
The only way that I could think of to achieve a closer comp would be some sort of centralised player allocation. Could that ever happen?
No doubtI don't know who was more amateur - Manly or the broadcast.
Both need to improve massively for this experiment to succeed.
I am not convinced that an allocation from the Tahs would change much. Either the players are playing for the Tahs and they are only available late in the season by which time it is too late to have an impact for a bottom 4 club. Or you get lucky and get a guy who is excellent at club rugby but doesn't make the 23 - which means he will likely be cut from the Tahs and go elsewhere for the following season.
Souths had the combination of strong group of young players. IIRC they made the GF in Colts 1, then 2nd Grade (might have won), then First Grade in a short period of time. Plus they had $ to attract multiple high quality players ie Timani brothers, Ulugia, Nic Henderson to name but a few.