amirite
Chilla Wilson (44)
But of a difference between having the occasional player not paying full subs at a Club (frequently due to socio-economic circumstances rather than rugby ability) as opposed to being "semi-pro".
I might be wrong but from what I've been told they run a pretty tight financial ship at Concord and what little money they have is spent very frugally. Billy Pulveriser would approve.
Semi-pro is the Tahs EPS and development players - circa $30k.
NRC players are on about $5k downwards for uncontracted players. $5k is about one weeks work for some professions. Would you call a person who only receives remuneration for their skills as a lawyer, doctor, dentist, vet, consultant, etc for one week each year a semi-pro or a volunteer?
Sure, I understand the point you're making but the fact is an athlete playing in a competition centred around exposure and development whilst being remunerated is pretty different to a lawyer/doctor volunteering their time behind closed doors out of the goodness of their heart and having costs covered.
For mine, an athlete training like a professional and receiving payment in any way, shape, or form is semi-pro. I think this is the most common definition of the term, but maybe it isn't. Either way, it isn't one I've constructed on my own.
As an aside - those Super development blokes getting $30-40k aren't 'semi-pro', they're just woefully underpaid professionals.