howyagoin
Ted Fahey (11)
Streaker was a sea eagles Toyota cup player... Leagues problem!and the streaker in the derby last year, just to show the beaches are about a joke as well.
Streaker was a sea eagles Toyota cup player... Leagues problem!and the streaker in the derby last year, just to show the beaches are about a joke as well.
A good team always beats a team of individuals..
Any sledging of the type allegedly directed at Harvey is unacceptable. The way to deal with it is to ban the offender/s if they can be identified. Unfortunately the Rats have had to deal with a few unfortunate incidents in recent years - spectators jumping into a fight (v Gordon?) a couple of years ago . As I recall the Rats management dealt with that quickly and decisively too and it is the only way
Stands.... Stands... STANDS!!!!!!!Here's one for the Marketing interns;
I was at a pub in the Hunter Valley on the weekend, saw the "Magners" brand on a tap a couple of times, then saw the Magners Pear cider for sale in a bottle shop ( on special) bought a couple of bottles, now I'm hooked. I love the stuff. So if someone else buys a bottle their sponsorship has paid off!
I would like to put this forward as THE call of the season (so Far)Half a landing strip, partial landing strip?
I admit I am not the sharpest knife in the block, so I need to observe some humility when I ask why no one saw how this would turn out shite.
Player Points as Club regulated seems to have been misinterpreted by many clubs.This "rule":Discounts cannot index players below 50% of their points.means that no player can ever be rated at 0, no matter how loyal they have been with the club.Browsing through the pp declarations on the NSW Rugby website shows several clubs who have discounted their players to 0.Under the rule above this can not happen, or can it???Another brilliant idea that is not working as intended.Are the sacked unpaid interns from ARU HQ and Tah's HQ working for the clubs?
Player Points as Club regulated seems to have been misinterpreted by many clubs.This "rule":Discounts cannot index players below 50% of their points.means that no player can ever be rated at 0, no matter how loyal they have been with the club.Browsing through the pp declarations on the NSW Rugby website shows several clubs who have discounted their players to 0.Under the rule above this can not happen, or can it???Another brilliant idea that is not working as intended.Are the sacked unpaid interns from ARU HQ and Tah's HQ working for the clubs?
1. what about that Aussie Schoolboy? Did he ever think he would be skulking around the sideline in the number 18 Jersey, ready to sub in 1sts as a result of being talented?
Hugh, I spotted this too.
Some clubs seem to have worked it out and have no players with "0" points, but others haven't.
How come nobody at NSWRU is checking / validating the submissions from the clubs?
Scrupulously fair, and unbiased - this will never do! Well written too. Thommo's one-eyed view available on the Two Blues WebsiteMatch report from Gordon's 1s and 2s can be found HERE