Dave Beat
Paul McLean (56)
It was the issue as I understand it but I'm informed all sorted now ...another battle in the long war with the corporation
Yup, and back to the real winner - rugby.
And ensuring those Woodies stay on side this year.
It was the issue as I understand it but I'm informed all sorted now ...another battle in the long war with the corporation
The irony being it is probably one of the most likeable Uni outfits in quite a while in terms of good young players getting a go , their colts not necessarily ruling the roost and a consequent reduction it seems on the Tom Carter hate barometer . Gee their 2's even let Gordon win!HJ I can't quite agree here. Over the season I haven't read too much antagonism against MMM - one or two only. However, the other mob have had a number of detractors over the years. We all know anyone's second team is that one playing against Uni. If the GF is that one I believe Manly will have overwhelming support
MMM have played fantastic footy all year and probably don't deserve any crossover tribalism from the Sea Eagles, especially when you note that they could be up against the Corporation.
Is everyone going to the footy this weekend barefoot to encourage the Hobbits in their semi against Buildcorp?
Hard to build animosity against the MMM when they have some of the nicest pies at the oval, and 4 Pines Brewery is within an easy stumble of the ground.
One suspects that it will be a very popular victory for the Marlins, although one fears that @Dave Beat's keyboard could meltdown.
SRU will show some backbone
Surely the Corporation were aware of the Water Polo shindig when they applied to host the matches on that weekend. That's right, they APPLIED to host.
Hey Dave, is it possible to put up the corresponding match from the Colts over the weekend?
Hey Dave, is it possible to put up the corresponding match from the Colts over the weekend?
What the Hobbits really destroyed was an unbelievable day at the Green watching Manly play Warringah for a spot in the GF. It would have been epic
I pluck it of the Manly website and it's done by someone with far more IT knowledge than me. Sounds like the Marlins pushed Randwick colts all the way, I'm looking forward to getting the email of the game.
I still reckon Uni's GF team if they make it, will be different to what team takes the field this week
Coach of the year: Luke Holmes(Warringah)
Catchpole: Luke Holmes(Warringah)
Rookie: Sio (Eastwood)
I still reckon Uni's GF team if they make it, will be different to what team takes the field this week
Here is the eligibility rule. Not sure it sheds much light
33.2 A player shall not be eligible to play in a Finals Series fixture unless:
(a) The player has played with the Club a minimum of four rounds during the Minor
Premiership series; or
(b) The player has been on representative duties during the current season and has played a minimum of two minor premiership matches in the current season at the same Club in which he is seeking eligibility, or has been a registered player with the club (according to MRA) without break for the previous two years.
(c) Players playing at an Australian SuperRugby Franchise that dictates the player
must play in the local competition may lodge an eligibility appeal.
33.3 A player shall not be eligible to play in a Finals Series fixture in any grade
lower than the grade in which he has played the majority of his last seven matches in the minor premiership.
33.4 If a player does not qualify for a particular grade under rule 33.3,
dispensation will be granted if the player has played 60% of his season in the grade
in which he wishes to play. If the player has been on representative duties as
described in 33.2, he shall be eligible for Shute Shield, 2nd Grade or 1
st Grade Colts only, subject to Colts eligibility.
Who? Most Super rugby players don't qualify
I think the Super Rugby players not involved with the Wallabies do qualify. If they didn't then Uni have breached the rules of qualification in previous years.Who? Most Super rugby players don't qualify