S
Sydney Wallabies
Guest
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...i-oval-for-final/story-e6frey4i-1225927002208
Souths angry at Uni oval for final
By Jon Geddes
From: The Daily Telegraph
September 21, 2010 12:00AM
SOUTHERN Districts have protested about playing their preliminary final against Sydney University on Sunday at University Oval, claiming the ground is dangerous and players risk serious injury.
And The Daily Telegraph is in receipt of an email from a rival team supporting Souths that described University Oval as "a sub-standard venue, and potentially hazardous".
They told Souths they should apply to have the final moved to Concord or TG Millner Field because University Oval was "just plain dangerous" and cricket will be played there next week.
"The cricket pitch is totally unacceptable for professional and semi-professional players to have to play on at this time of year," Souths coach Darren Bray said.
"I have genuine concerns about my players getting hurt and other clubs have made noises about it as well."
Souths are also angry that the Students are the only team to get a home-ground advantage through the finals.
The game was set down for University Oval after the club won a tender to host the game.
"The whole thing stinks, it's not fair and is not in the spirit of the agreement laid at a presidents' meeting a couple of Wednesdays ago," Souths football manager Max Currie said yesterday.
"And what sort of a tender process was it?
"They chose Woollahra, Coogee and University Oval with no parking."
Outgoing NSW Rugby CEO Jim L'Estrange said University had played 11 home games this year and University Oval was a very safe ground.
He said that despite Souths complaints, the finals venue would not be changed.
L'Estrange said that clubs had voted to put the semi-final venues out to tender and that had all happened about two months ago.
He said three weeks ago club presidents said that there should be an attempt to avoid any teams in first grade getting a home-ground advantage.
"But that is easier said than done," he said.
"You can't run a tender process and then tell people the tender process doesn't work any more."
Souths angry at Uni oval for final
By Jon Geddes
From: The Daily Telegraph
September 21, 2010 12:00AM
SOUTHERN Districts have protested about playing their preliminary final against Sydney University on Sunday at University Oval, claiming the ground is dangerous and players risk serious injury.
And The Daily Telegraph is in receipt of an email from a rival team supporting Souths that described University Oval as "a sub-standard venue, and potentially hazardous".
They told Souths they should apply to have the final moved to Concord or TG Millner Field because University Oval was "just plain dangerous" and cricket will be played there next week.
"The cricket pitch is totally unacceptable for professional and semi-professional players to have to play on at this time of year," Souths coach Darren Bray said.
"I have genuine concerns about my players getting hurt and other clubs have made noises about it as well."
Souths are also angry that the Students are the only team to get a home-ground advantage through the finals.
The game was set down for University Oval after the club won a tender to host the game.
"The whole thing stinks, it's not fair and is not in the spirit of the agreement laid at a presidents' meeting a couple of Wednesdays ago," Souths football manager Max Currie said yesterday.
"And what sort of a tender process was it?
"They chose Woollahra, Coogee and University Oval with no parking."
Outgoing NSW Rugby CEO Jim L'Estrange said University had played 11 home games this year and University Oval was a very safe ground.
He said that despite Souths complaints, the finals venue would not be changed.
L'Estrange said that clubs had voted to put the semi-final venues out to tender and that had all happened about two months ago.
He said three weeks ago club presidents said that there should be an attempt to avoid any teams in first grade getting a home-ground advantage.
"But that is easier said than done," he said.
"You can't run a tender process and then tell people the tender process doesn't work any more."