On the subject of Michael Wells however - i think he has made a few people eat their words this year with the level of his performances ... The GPS selectors have shown how inept they are at selecting teams ... ... ... He is not in any ARU programmes or talent squads so he is proof that if you play well enough you are a very good chance of getting picked.
BWF,
I hear what you are saying mate and subscribe to your point of view. In other words talent does not evolve in a vacuum, it is always exisits and sometimes it takes that one coach/selector with a keen sense of acuity to identify that x factor that others can't see. In your example it has been Michael Wells, a lad who apparently never let his opportunuty go to waste ... carpe diem!!!!
I however I am trying to ascertain if NS's theory has some credibility (it is not the first time I have heard his assertion). I will go out on a limb a suggest that it does because the lad who I believe will be adversely affected is (ironically) in the same situation as Fabian Natoli (and for the benefit of CTPE here, can I respectfully ask if I can defer my answer until after 6 July. However CTPE I would be willing to answer you privately if you would keep the same in confidence).
I personally have an understanding of the internal mechanics of the Harold Matthews (U/16) and SG Ball (U/18) league competitons. As stated earlier Natoli is presently in the Manly SG Ball team (as an under 17) and even though the comp is now finished preparatory training for next year would have probably commenced like most other NRL clubs. During the season proper SG Ball teams generally train 4 nights a week (with Thursday being the normal rest day), and as such I will suggest that would leave someone like Natoli with no time to train or play rugby other that in school.
The point I am trying to make is this; someone of Natoli's talent would have definitely been approached by the ARU to join its JGS and/or NTS, however he probably would not have had the time to attend given what I have said above. I know there will be some here (and quite rightly so) who will suggest that why should rugby spend time and resources trying to develop players who will probably go to league, and I agree. However the question I then ask in response is this; has rugby done all it can to hold on to the talent his presently has?
In support of my assertion I would invite all and sundry to google a 'Daily Telegraph' article from 29 June 2010 about Rob Horne. The article is titled
"How Rob Horne was almost lost to a rival code" . Read the extract pertaining to the intervention by Manu Sutherland, and then ask if somone like Fabian Natoli was given the same courtesy? I believe that such an exercise is warranted, and if it has occurred. Let Natoli rot in the NSWII's!
Regards,
Newbie