T
tblackadder
Guest
I read Nick Farr Jones had recommended scrapping the THird vs 4th game and in its place making the fixture a SH vs NH game.
I think that idea has legs.
No one gives a sh*t about 3rd vs 4th. The only value i can see for a 3rd vs 4th game if that if you support the winning teams in semis you get to see your great foes who have just been vanquished having to turn up for a nothing game which really just emphasises that 4 years later they have fallen short again....
Logistically though i think the 3rd vs 4th game is played close to the final..if the SH v NH game is played at the same time it would have be a SH vs NH (without the players in the final)
and ideally a NH vs SH game would include players from the particpants in the final and that cant happen unless they have it after the final
I think that idea has legs.
No one gives a sh*t about 3rd vs 4th. The only value i can see for a 3rd vs 4th game if that if you support the winning teams in semis you get to see your great foes who have just been vanquished having to turn up for a nothing game which really just emphasises that 4 years later they have fallen short again....
Logistically though i think the 3rd vs 4th game is played close to the final..if the SH v NH game is played at the same time it would have be a SH vs NH (without the players in the final)
and ideally a NH vs SH game would include players from the particpants in the final and that cant happen unless they have it after the final