I understand. The free rein they had in days past when other were in charge of sport are now over. There is still some messing with the books in basketball but not to the level on 2012/2013 when it was just rampant. Newington still give them, Kings has a couple of dodgy ones, but Scots WERE the gold medal class of rorting the system as the GPS heads knew of when they confronted Scots in 2013 with actual documents showing they did. This was unheard of but Scots have changed and now focus on "building" players with the occasional lad parachuting in. I am aware there are still some approaches made to families at the NSWPSSA level. But they then start in year 7 and it doesn't always work out. Hard to know if they will be champions still by year 11/12.
I think that we all understand that in the past both Scots and Newington pushed the envelope and were called out on this thread by me and others for a number of years.
I don't believe in either case that this is still happening.
It's interesting that when I've also highlighted the arrival of talent at either Joeys or Riverview, we get a familiar set of excuses offered. These excuses may or may not be correct, but I find it a little inconsistent that those who happily either offer or support these excuses, are quick to point the finger at others.
I'll go back through the thread and find them if anyone doubts what I'm saying. (Post 6350 highlights one issue)
As an example, I was told (by a Joeys parent) that about 7 of the SJC 15As started at the school this year. Now I'm sure that there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for these, but I wonder if we had replaced SJC with another school what the reaction would have been.
It's acknowledged that Joeys bring kids in on bursaries for social justice reasons, and it's a great programme. Just be aware that other schools also provide means-tested bursaries for social justice reasons.