I didn't know volume was an issue. If there is an issues in the 14s I find it funny that the Marlins raise it.
Brian, I just hope Junge pulls you into line because I am unsure what you had to add. I had nothing but respect for your commentary until that comment
Cruel but fair,unfortunately I had my cash on him getting to 17 posts....Back to kindergarten for that one.
At least at Northbridge, they're calling them leadership scholarships and not trying to pretend that the recipients are either a) uniquely intelligent or b) musically talented.
I'll be interested to see how many "leadership scholars" end up as student leaders (i.e. School Captain/ Senior Prefect etc)
QH, are you referring to the "Senior Open Scholarship 1 & 2" at Shore when you reference leadership scholarships? If so, I can confirm that despite being labelled open these are given to students who already attend Shore at the end of year 10 on the basis of their rank in the Order of Academic Merit list.
Yes fair enough, I was puzzled by that.No I was referring to the ones advertised in the paper last year seeking boys to start in Year 11.
I also not that you denied that any team/club recruited anyone on the basis of size. That's a view to which you are perfectly entitled, however, my eyes and ears tell me otherwise and from the private messages sent to me by other posters I'm not the only one who has witnessed this phenomenon.
Way too cryptic for me.A least Uber drivers will be making a dollar out of this, they just need to work out what playing fields to hang around.
But will domestic airlines also be making a dollar out of this in the current season as they have in the past?
Way too cryptic for me.
Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk
If you were referring to my post in the GPS thread, I did mention Trinity boys at Waverley but I did not say they were recruited.
What I said was the make-up of the Waverley team this year was (significantly) different to last year. There were some boys in the team previously from Trinity that I recognised from last year and I know from the club scene. How & why they got to Waverley I don't know. As much as I hate recruiting I do not want to cast aspersions on anyone.
We didn't get to 344 pages with that sort of attitudeHow & why they got to Waverley I don't know. As much as I hate recruiting I do not want to cast aspersions on anyone.
Brisk walk to Summer Hill station, couple of trains to Bondi Junction and another stroll up the hill. Easy. If they jog, even better for rugby.If you were referring to my post in the GPS thread, I did mention Trinity boys at Waverley but I did not say they were recruited.
What I said was the make-up of the Waverley team this year was (significantly) different to last year. There were some boys in the team previously from Trinity that I recognised from last year and I know from the club scene. How & why they got to Waverley I don't know. As much as I hate recruiting I do not want to cast aspersions on anyone.
Brand loyalty to a particular religious faith seems to be on the wane.No problem, that's why I put it as a question to see if anyone knew. On face value a move from Trinity to Waverley seems unusual.
If you were referring to my post in the GPS thread, I did mention Trinity boys at Waverley but I did not say they were recruited.
What I said was the make-up of the Waverley team this year was (significantly) different to last year. There were some boys in the team previously from Trinity that I recognised from last year and I know from the club scene. How & why they got to Waverley I don't know. As much as I hate recruiting I do not want to cast aspersions on anyone.
Did I read correctly on the GPS thread that Waverley 16As contain recruits from other schools, including some from Trinity?
I'd always assumed that Waverley didn't recruit, but this is the second mention of recruiting there.
This new format of school rugby seems to have increased the need to recruit, not reduced it.
My understanding is that in the case of Trinity additions the boys' left that school for varied reasons and had pre-existing contacts (some rugby) with Waverley boys so asked to come across. Given the fees are about a third of those of peer schools, it's an attractive choice for parents. And if a boy is a good rugby player and there is room to fit him in then who wouldn't take him in.
The school also has a comparative advantage wrt location and some league types (and in the past AFL type) find it easier to mix league commitments with schooling at Waverley. Again, the much lower fees make this an attractive option compared to geographic peer schools.
So there are many and varied reasons why boys change schools and go to particular schools other than 'being given a scholarship'.