So $25'000 to one player and $10'000 to another player.
Yes it is a deliberate breach of the salary cap, but at the same time the actual amount is pretty small when compared to the overall salary cap..
Seems to me ARU/involved persons have screwed up by even leaking this information, should have been kept on the down low and a financial penalty imposed at the end, all this has done is brought discredit upon the game. When there wasn't enough already.
Is it the mudchooks? Is the player Mr Timms?
Nussink? Yeah I know him too, and if you see him tell him he owes $50.I know nussink
Are you suggesting those 3, and only those 3 had knowledge of this rort?This story shines a whole new light on the recent resignations of the Chairman, Manager and Coach of the Tahs.
The issue is not the amount of money but the principle and the FACT that the CEOs or their designate sign Statutory Declarations that they have complied with requirements. Do we tolerate blatant dishonesty on top of incompetence? The leaking of the information from the ARU just reflects on that board and its members also who have shown their high level of ethics in reviews previously.
This story shines a whole new light on the recent resignations of the Chairman, Manager and Coach of the Tahs.
easts and southern districtsAnyone bold enough to guess - the club?
That would leave the back as Rob Horne and the fringe forward player as Richard Stanford?E
easts and southern districts
Not necessarily - he said that the ARU have requested that only they comment on the matter. He was stuck between being stoned by the public and being stoned by the ARU, and IMO, he chose correctly.The fact that Jason Allen refused to comment on it screams volumes.
They're stoned? That explains so much. I also now understand why they put an Oporto in at the SFS.He was stuck between being stoned by the public and being stoned by the ARU
He says the ARU have requested that only they comment, and the other franchises say"categorically it's not us"Not necessarily - he said that the ARU have requested that only they comment on the matter. He was stuck between being stoned by the public and being stoned by the ARU, and IMO, he chose correctly.
He says the ARU have requested that only they comment, and the other franchises say"categorically it's not us"
says a bit to me...