• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

RWC: AUS v ENG (Twickenham): POOL A; 6am (AEDT) Sunday 4 October

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dewald Nel

Dewald Nel

Cyril Towers (30)
attachment.php


attachment.php
 
Mr Doug

Mr Doug

Dick Tooth (41)
barbarian said:
Coverage in today's papers in Sydney was pretty good I thought. Multi-page spreads in the Tele and Herald.

Obviously played second fiddle to the NRL, but I'm not sure that article is on the money.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


Yes barbarian, I bought a Telegraph this arvo on the GC. A two page spread on the "Good guys in gold" even got this far north!!
 
Dewald Nel

Dewald Nel

Cyril Towers (30)
Just saw the Hooper GIF for which he got cited. That's retarded. I can't think of a single thing he did wrong there. What next, will people get cited for tackling too hard?
 
Dewald Nel

Dewald Nel

Cyril Towers (30)
Hugh Jarse said:
^^ Already happening. Don't you remember The Battleship being Yellow Carded for a ripper of a tackle against Dan Carter a year or two back?
Click to expand...


Didn't wanna be the one to mention that, so thanks. ;)

At least that red card got scrapped from his record after it was found to be a totally incorrect call, and red cards are automatic citings. That was the ref being a total nutcase, and not the citing commission luckily.
 
G

galumay

Guest
Hugh Jarse said:
1. You may get cited by the Citing bloke even if the act of foul play isn't deemed worthy of a red card.
2. If the act cited fails to meet the red card criteria in the Citing Bloke's view, then it is off to the Gunston Corp Wet Lettuce Leaf Thrash-o-matic.
Click to expand...

I wouldnt be so sure of part 2.) of your reply, having been cited for " an alleged act of foul play contrary to law 10.4 (h) (charging into a ruck or maul without use of the arms or grasping the player)", i believe he could get anywhere from 2-10 weeks depending on severity and mitigation. It wil be a nervous couple of days for Hooper & the Wobblies I suspect.
 
KOB1987

KOB1987

John Eales (66)
Burgess gets a warning and no mention of Farrell? They'll say the latter was dealt with at the time no doubt


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Strewthcobber

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
galumay said:
I wouldnt be so sure of part 2.) of your reply, having been cited for " an alleged act of foul play contrary to law 10.4 (h) (charging into a ruck or maul without use of the arms or grasping the player)", i believe he could get anywhere from 2-10 weeks depending on severity and mitigation. It wil be a nervous couple of days for Hooper & the Wobblies I suspect.
Click to expand...
Yep. Second suspension in a couple of months means he won't get any reduction for good behaviour or for saying sorry and really meaning it. At least two weeks.
 
No4918

No4918

John Hipwell (52)
KOB1987 said:
Burgess gets a warning and no mention of Farrell? They'll say the latter was dealt with at the time no doubt


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


I didn't mind the Farrell incident after seeing it again. He genuinely thought Giteau was getting the ball and would have belted him. Don't see much difference there to Douglas' late hit which was only a penalty, in some ways Douglas' shot may be worse as it was very late and Farrell had little time to pull out.

Burgess is very lucky as his hit was high and there was some carry-on once it got to ground.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top