I have had a couple of hours sleep and time to ruminate on the game, so my thoughts:- Points 1 and 2 general issues over all the games.
1) The Wallaby Lineout was identified as a problem last EOYT. It continued to be a problem in the RC and no specialist consultant or coach came in to fix the primary set piece possession. The Wallabies were not secure on their own ball not only in this game but in most RWC games and many possessions were of poor to middling class. On top of that the opposition set piece was under no pressure at all. This is a glaring failure by Chieka IMO, and was a point of concern greatly discussed on this forum even if people wanted to focus overly of the presence or absence of particular players instead of technical performance.
2) The scrum, while greatly improved I just do not see Australia ever getting a fair and consistent appraisal by the officials in this area, possibly because they have no idea what is going on. In one re-set the ABs got last night McCaw was bound onto Sio and Franks was driving across at 45 degree right in front of Owens, before the ball was fed. The one area I'd like to see the TMO extended is the scrum, use the video ref to review the binding and set up and penalise them, if not do away with it altogether (which I never want to see as I love the scrum when it is policed and a fair contest).
3) The Wallabies looked stuffed at the outset. Slow and lacking in power. Same as they did in long phases against the Argentinians and especially against the Scots. The pool of death eventually claimed its last scalp. I also thought the work of Hooper decreased greatly as the games and competition wore on, in both volume and effectiveness. He was conspicuous in his absence and could that also be down to pure fatigue?
4) The Wallabies attack was pretty poor throughout, I thought. Very one dimensional and lacking in the depth support that we came to admire from the Tahs in 2014. In fact they looked very Brumbies like, and that IMO is just far to predictable and ineffective against the better defensive sides. I said it a month ago and am more convinced than ever that Larkham should go back to the Brumbies and learn how to coach a decent attacking line, and no I don't think the selection of Quade Cooper would have improved anything except him getting blamed when he started to try and do things on his own when there were no real structures around him, just like Beale did towards the end.
5) The Wallabies were never in this game, others will point to the score board and the tries the Wallabies scored, but it ignores the numbers of possession, missed tackles, territory, gain line success etc. I said to my mate at 30 minutes that it was game over, unless the Wallabies came out breathing fire in the second half, and unfortunately nobody had the gas to do it. Really great effort by the Wallabies to fight back but the ABs were just cruising at that point and one man down, they then stepped up and walked away with the game.
6) Finally I like many others am disappointed in the performance of Owens. The dithering over the yellow card to Smith for an unarguable tip tackle just allows those with a conspiracy/bias agenda to flourish, as was the non penalty for the head high tackle and quite a few other decisions/lack there of. The fact is that nothing Owens did or didn't do had any impact on the outcome as point 5 stands.
7) I am not too disappointed by the result, as I said last week the Wallabies have outperformed my expectations from last year where I fully expected them to be eliminated in the Pool stages. Even after the Eden Park debacle I remained fairly pessimistic about the RWC prospects. So all up I cannot be too upset, Chieka has done remarkably well to rebuild the side and play a different style in under 12 months.
Finally we could hope that the ARU would leverage off the interest that the RWC has generated, but we are talking about the ARU here.