• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

RWC 2011 Odds (Not safe for A. Wilkie)

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bazzamacca

Guest
The oddsmakers, in Australia at any rate, have the Kiwis as favourites at $2, Oz at $4, SA at $8, the Poms at $11 and the Frogs at $15. Its a fairly safe assumption that the winner will come from this group.

Which odds provide the greatest opportunity at this point?

Kiwis - $2 is damn short in a 5 horse race in any event. The Kiwis are obviously playing at home, where they have a formidable record - invincible in the case of the Poms - against all comers. The Frogs have tipped them over at home but they will only see them in the Final in terms of knockout matches. the Safas and Aussies can beat NZ at home, but do so less than they would like, especially lately. The Poms wont beat NZ with their current squad, should they play them. The Kiws are deserved faves, however an injury to either Carter or McCaw and they become somewhat vulnerable. Their locks and backrow haven't the greatest depth, so were injury to strike there....Finally what makes me nervous about NZ is that they have to beat 2 Trinations sides to win - SA in the semi, then Oz in the final (dont start me on this have you seen the French squad?) Unusual for RWC winners to defeat 2 fellow Trinats in the knockouts and win the tournament.

Oz - a year or two short? Have they sorted the scrum [achilles#1] problem, which could be the undoing in the semifinal against Eng (or Fra)? Will QC (Quade Cooper) continue to be selected despite eschewing tackling? Will Rocky and or Vickerman show up? How will the injuries play out - Oz has a great first xv, but second xv? Hmmmm.... I think $4 is short odds for Oz - they have a lot of show, but how much go? If the scrum is settled - and at full strength (no Queenslanders) and QC (Quade Cooper) (Queenslander) learns how to tackle, we are in with a shot.

SA - for mine, their prospects rely on the return of Juan Smith. This guy is a demon. His possible replacement, Willem Alberts, is a monster and is cracking on this season and F Louw is also quality, but there is no replacing Smith. Return of Brussouw is wonderful, on the other hand. Prospects also rely on the return to form of their three locks - Botha, Mat and Bekker. They are getting old, Bekker aside and repeated suspension may have taken the wind out of Botha's sails. Talent, experience, depth in the Bok forwards - I mean look at LHP with Beast and Steenkamp - but they need to pull it together over the next few months. Completely doable. Turning to the backs, FDP: see above. Rest of the backs are fantastic - Fourie especially. Basson is a real find btw.

England - nice performance against Oz last time out, indicating talent, after some choppy performances - to which they returned in the 6N. Inconsistent. Forwards are fine - as usual. Dave Attwood and Courtney Lawes apparently amongst the strongest scrummaging locks in intl rugby. Out back they are fine, too, with one of the world best back three players in Ashton (smarmy cnut, nevertheless). Centres very meat and potatoes in Hape and Tins (who has never lost to Australia). I think the Frogs will knock these guys off in the 1/4s with their squad quality not quite what it has been in Cups gone by.

Frogs - no Jauzion in the squad:angryfire:, half the guys selected are injured and they have to beat England, Oz and one of SA/NZ to win the thing. Have you seen their centre selections. Yikes. No chance, but will somehow make the semis.


Note: Big props to GAGR - the worlds premier rugby union site and forum. Let me say there are some rank characters lobbing around rugby cyberspace, notably the planet-rugby forum. Good to escape trolling shitstirrers over there and join the Aussie strength that is Noddy and Lee Grant.
 
T

TheTruth

Guest
The oddsmakers, in Australia at any rate, have the Kiwis as favourites at $2, Oz at $4, SA at $8, the Poms at $11 and the Frogs at $15. Its a fairly safe assumption that the winner will come from this group.

Which odds provide the greatest opportunity at this point?

Kiwis - $2 is damn short in a 5 horse race in any event. The Kiwis are obviously playing at home, where they have a formidable record - invincible in the case of the Poms - against all comers. The Frogs have tipped them over at home but they will only see them in the Final in terms of knockout matches. the Safas and Aussies can beat NZ at home, but do so less than they would like, especially lately. The Poms wont beat NZ with their current squad, should they play them. The Kiws are deserved faves, however an injury to either Carter or McCaw and they become somewhat vulnerable. Their locks and backrow haven't the greatest depth, so were injury to strike there....Finally what makes me nervous about NZ is that they have to beat 2 Trinations sides to win - SA in the semi, then Oz in the final (dont start me on this have you seen the French squad?) Unusual for RWC winners to defeat 2 fellow Trinats in the knockouts and win the tournament.

Oz - a year or two short? Have they sorted the scrum [achilles#1] problem, which could be the undoing in the semifinal against Eng (or Fra)? Will QC (Quade Cooper) continue to be selected despite eschewing tackling? Will Rocky and or Vickerman show up? How will the injuries play out - Oz has a great first xv, but second xv? Hmmmm.... I think $4 is short odds for Oz - they have a lot of show, but how much go? If the scrum is settled - and at full strength (no Queenslanders) and QC (Quade Cooper) (Queenslander) learns how to tackle, we are in with a shot.

SA - for mine, their prospects rely on the return of Juan Smith. This guy is a demon. His possible replacement, Willem Alberts, is a monster and is cracking on this season and F Louw is also quality, but there is no replacing Smith. Return of Brussouw is wonderful, on the other hand. Prospects also rely on the return to form of their three locks - Botha, Mat and Bekker. They are getting old, Bekker aside and repeated suspension may have taken the wind out of Botha's sails. Talent, experience, depth in the Bok forwards - I mean look at LHP with Beast and Steenkamp - but they need to pull it together over the next few months. Completely doable. Turning to the backs, FDP: see above. Rest of the backs are fantastic - Fourie especially. Basson is a real find btw.

England - nice performance against Oz last time out, indicating talent, after some choppy performances - to which they returned in the 6N. Inconsistent. Forwards are fine - as usual. Dave Attwood and Courtney Lawes apparently amongst the strongest scrummaging locks in intl rugby. Out back they are fine, too, with one of the world best back three players in Ashton (smarmy cnut, nevertheless). Centres very meat and potatoes in Hape and Tins (who has never lost to Australia). I think the Frogs will knock these guys off in the 1/4s with their squad quality not quite what it has been in Cups gone by.

Frogs - no Jauzion in the squad:angryfire:, half the guys selected are injured and they have to beat England, Oz and one of SA/NZ to win the thing. Have you seen their centre selections. Yikes. No chance, but will somehow make the semis.


Note: Big props to GAGR - the worlds premier rugby union site and forum. Let me say there are some rank characters lobbing around rugby cyberspace, notably the planet-rugby forum. Good to escape trolling shitstirrers over there - mainly unemployed troll Kiwis like the unseemly Ali's Choice - and join the Aussie strength that is Noddy and Lee Grant.

Fucking stupid fucking comment about Queenslanders - fuck off
 
B

bazzamacca

Guest
Fucking stupid fucking comment about Queenslanders - fuck off

I repeat, QC (Quade Cooper)'s pansy defence and any Reds scrummaging involvement (Kepu>Palmer>>>>>>>>Slipper) will lose Australia the 2011 RWC.
 
T

TheTruth

Guest
I repeat, QC (Quade Cooper)'s pansy defence and any Reds scrummaging involvement (Kepu>Palmer>>>>>>>>Slipper) will lose Australia the 2011 RWC.

Bazza, I also repeat my considered opinion, once again - just for you
 

Godfrey

Phil Hardcastle (33)
Irrespective of other forums, it's pretty poor form to come in and rubbish an excellent contributor to the forum (at no stage has Ali's Choice even verged on being a troll - in fact his posts are among the most measured despite his allegiance to the Crusaders) while making the same old sweeping comments about whichever state you happen not to like.

It's ridiculous to think there will be no Queenslanders in the forward pack, Horwill is a certainty and was an integral part of the excellent scrum of 2009 while Slipper was probably the most consistently well-performed prop at international level last year for Oz and is one of the most important members of a Queensland team that is currently number 2 in the competition. "Queenslander" isn't a reason - back yourself up or YOU are the troll.
 

Gagger

Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Staff member
Bazza,

Welcome to the forum and thanks for the kind comments

BUT

Leave out the flaming comments on individuals and states. That's exactly why we're not like PR

You've been warned

Lets all move on
 
B

bazzamacca

Guest
Bazza,

Welcome to the forum and thanks for the kind comments

BUT

Leave out the flaming comments on individuals and states. That's exactly why we're not like PR

You've been warned

Lets all move on

As a gesture of good faith I have edited my OP, Gagger. I am surprised re the no Queensland flaming. Whats next - no dissing Tom Carter?
 

rugbysmartarse

Alan Cameron (40)
agree - they have a pretty good trip into the semis where they face us, who they beat twice last year and at all RWCs. From there its the final vthe WC chokers. Ironically, their biggest hurdle is topping their group and getting on the other side of the draw
 

The_Brown_Hornet

John Eales (66)
agree - they have a pretty good trip into the semis where they face us, who they beat twice last year and at all RWCs. From there its the final vthe WC chokers. Ironically, their biggest hurdle is topping their group and getting on the other side of the draw

Erm, there was this final in 1991 that I need to tell you about. We beat them in 1987 too.
 
D

daz

Guest
England worry me. My heart says that the Wobs will get to the final against the All Blucks, but my head is saying we might just trip against the Poms. Again. The pain of 2007 is still far too raw and last year didn't help. Touch wood, spin three times and spit.

I honestly don't know why I should be worried. Sure, we have had our issues with the scrum against the Poms but we have some pretty handy and hardened artillery of our own now. And our backs should be carving those plodding bastards up all day and twice on Sunday.

But I'm still worried.

It is no secret that I am a big fan of what Deans has done and when they are on, the Wobs are a bloody good rugby team, but the old adage of "defence wins world cups" keeps me up at night....Youngs, Cueto, Armitage and Ashton will run and run at our weak channel; every time we fill the gaps on one side we open up gaps on the other side.
 

The_Brown_Hornet

John Eales (66)
Daz, I've shared that concern for some time now. On paper we should blow these guys off the park most games, but knockout stage matches in RWC's are slightly different animals and tend to be lower risk affairs. In other words, exactly the kinds of games that suit England. We should have beaten them in 2007, but they were more energetic, more enthusiastic, harder and more accurate (especially with the boot). We looked clueless as to how to break them down. I will say this though, over the last three years, we've gone to Twickenham with allegedly weaker teams than England and knocked them over twice, including giving them a hiding in the forwards. We need that same focus and execution showed in those games. We won't beat them by just flinging the ball around, it will take a lot more discipline than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daz
B

bazzamacca

Guest
Pretty simple - if we select the NSW pack plus Rocky and Poey, we will be sweet up front.There is a *Small* case for selecting Horwill. If we select Barnes and JOC (James O'Connor) at 10/12 defence will be OK. QC (Quade Cooper) is a turnstile and his selection for RWC finals rugby must be confined to the final 10mins if we are three tries ahead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top