lucky indeed considering his history.
Him shaving off that initial week is that because he was binned for a significant amount of time in the game? If he was RC'ed in the 75th or not RC'ed at all does he get an extra week?
I probably misspoke and applied my own biases there: moreso that incidents noted and punished on field tend to be looked upon slightly more leniently than any only picked up post match.
But ironically, his previous suspension seems to have benefited him here. By the release:
Scotland prop, Zander Fagerson, appeared before an independent judicial committee via video link having received a red card for an act of foul play contrary to Law 9.20 (a) (Dangerous play in a ruck or maul. “A player must not charge into a ruck or maul. Charging includes any contact made without binding onto another player in the ruck or maul.”) in the Summer Nations Series match between Scotland and France on Saturday 5 August 2023.
The independent Judicial Committee consisting of Rhian Williams – Chair (Wales), Jamie Corsi (Wales) and Juan Pablo Spirandelli (Argentina) heard the case, considering all the available evidence and submissions from the player and his representatives.
In considering submissions made on behalf of the player, the Committee agreed to amend the offence to Law 9.20 (b) (Dangerous play in a ruck or maul. A player must not make contact with an opponent above the line of the shoulders.)
The player admitted that he had committed an act of foul play under the revised Law and that it was worthy of a red card. After reviewing all the evidence, the Committee applied World Rugby’s mandatory minimum mid-range entry point for foul play resulting in contact with the head. This resulted in a starting point of a four week suspension.
Reading between the lines, that suggests an argument of "yes, it was a dangerous act worthy of a red card and a suspension is deserved. But compare the two incidents: the first is reckless, aggressive and extremely dangerous, this one, while still dangerous and sloppily executed, shows a substantial change in technique and intention by the player. If the purpose of these regulations is prevention of injury, not punishment, please acknowledge that positive progress made and provide further opportunity to improve."
Now, all that is bullshit designed to give as much wiggle room to judiciaries to ensure as few players are missing from the RWC as possible, fully would have expected him to miss the full four in any other situation, but it's not half bad bullshit.