GaffaCHinO
Peter Sullivan (51)
Alittle bit of topic but the last few weeks of the Olympic hearing Gordon Bray commentate on the Sailing. brought back so many memory’s of when rugby commentators knew what they where on about!
Sports shows of any stripe have never been particularly investigative, especially when they are of the panel variety. Why would or should this be any different for The Rugby Club?
it must have been a coincidence that it brought back such memories.Alittle bit of topic but the last few weeks of the Olympic hearing Gordon Bray commentate on the Sailing. brought back so many memory’s of when rugby commentators knew what they where on about!
when does it start? They'd call a spade a spade.I would refer you to the AFL program "On the couch". That program looks at issues, teams and management with an honesty that if the same was applied to rugby would blow the top off the game, much for its betterment. Its on every week, the people on it are senior ex-coaches and players and the result is a wonderful program run by people who love their game. Think of a panel program each week with Dwyer, Connolly and Macqueen moderated by Adam Freier.
The AFL do it. Strange that the AFL are also the number one football code in Australia.
I would listen to Bray over Clarke anyday of the week. But was more talking about the other idiots on fox.it must have been a coincidence that it brought back such memories.
He called a good game but it's stretching it to suggest, if you are, that he knew more about the game than Greg Clarke, to take an example.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I found the unnaturally inserted background briefings to be a pain in the neck.I would listen to Bray over Clarke anyday of the week. But was more talking about the other idiots on fox.
I would refer you to the AFL program "On the couch". That program looks at issues, teams and management with an honesty that if the same was applied to rugby would blow the top off the game, much for its betterment. Its on every week, the people on it are senior ex-coaches and players and the result is a wonderful program run by people who love their game. Think of a panel program each week with Dwyer, Connolly and Macqueen moderated by Adam Freier.
The AFL do it. Strange that the AFL are also the number one football code in Australia.
Generally, complaints I hear from mungo fans is that they don't understand Rugby. Maybe more tactics will help win over fans as they develop a greater appreciation of rugby and its nuances. Humour may engage new fans but they quickly turn off when it comes to the main game.
I agree. Explanation of the rules and more importantly the nuances of the game would benefit not only newcomers, but also a lot of the younger viewers, viewers who have not actually played the game and spouses of the addicted (male and female).
Once again I said it earlier but I would just like to see a general segment on a particular law each week using actual game footage to show the infringement, etc. Use a current or up and coming referee to walk through it on the screen like Kafes chalkboard. At some point you'd go over the same laws again but using different games because for it to sink in you need a bit of repetition.
Would having this function as an optional red-button foxtel thingy work in live games? Maybe have it on all the time but you can switch if off with the red-button if you want. Would definitely help educate the masses.
I don't mind shutting Foxtel commentary off and just watching and making my own interpretations about what is going on.
Clark is OK, but the comments and color idiots that they have for Aust games is absolutely cringeworthy.
Used to love turning the volume down in the ch nein cricket games and listening to the ABC commentary one the radio. Can't do that anymore due to time lags between the various broadcasters.
I found the unnaturally inserted background briefings to be a pain in the neck.