What's wrong with this scrum?
View attachment 3455
And what happened next?
Others have covered the answer.
There is nothing wrong with it - it is just unusual to put the ball into your own scrum from your tight-head side, because the opposing hooker is closer to the ball than your own hooker is.
The point about it is not which side the ball was put in from. The point is that Danny Care of Harlequins knew that he wouldn't be pinged for a crooked feed angled away from the Gloucester hooker.
I felt an ache of sadness when I saw it. It was poignant reminder that the hooking contest was dead because of the power hit. And I felt that there was not one player on the park that realised that, because they didn't know what they didn't know. All they knew was that a crooked feed was OK for both sides.
Since the spawning of the power hit the scrum tunnel got so corrupted by front rowers' feet moving around to get balance that referees turned a blind eye to skew feeds, especially in the last ten years. Often there was no tunnel to throw the ball into.
Without direction from above, the referees established a convention that a rugby law, which required the ball to be thrown into the mid-line of a scrum, could be ignored. They thereby subtracted a wonderful contest from our sport, the hooking contest, and changed the game that I used to know.
Even when the tunnel was clear they permitted skew feeds yet the same fellows pinged 15 metre throws to the lineout a few degrees off when opponents weren't contesting.
The power hit should have been nipped in the bud, but I will save readers an essay about how they could have nipped it.
Why did Danny Care want to throw the ball in from his tight-head side anyway? His Harlequins' team had quite a wide blind side to work with and there were two Quins backs stalking the area, marked up by two opponents.
He hoped that by putting the ball in on the open side (his tight-head side) that Dave Lewis, the Gloucester reserve scrummie, would follow him over there to leave two against two on the blind - but Lewis stayed on the blind side.
Lewis didn't arrive in town on the last bus and knew that Care would be facing his two Quins' team mates on the blind side when he retreated to the rear of the scrum to pick the ball up, and would likely pass the pill in that direction.
What happened next?
There had to be a reset and Care, realising that Lewis wasn't fooled, went back to the normal LH side of the scrum to put the ball in.
Paul Moriaty, one of the Gloucester assistant coaches, immediately complained that referee JP Doyle had been wrong in law in allowing Care to switch sides on the reset. He pointed out, correctly, that the reset put-in had to be done on the same side.
JP Doyle lets a lot of things go when he has the whistle, especially around the ruck, where Rafferty's rules seem to apply. He shouldn't have let that matter 'go' either.
.