Hugh Jarse
Rocky Elsom (76)
I am of the opinion that the Art of Rugby can not be reduced to a science by reducing the game to a series of numbers such as tackles made, tackles missed, "mistakes" made, ball carries, passes, kicks etc by individual players.
My view of this is also that if these "numbers" are taken by one person with a clipboard watching the game live, or a past match "player stats" review of a one fixed camera video by one person, then the stats are generally meaningless, one dimentional and can often have a very detrimental effect on team morale.
Rucking Good Stats can probably vouch for the time and effort needed to compile accurate and meaningful stats for a game.
Not all "tackles made" are equal, not all "tackles missed" have meaningful consequences for the team, not all "Rucks attended" contribute to overall team performance.
Can the game be reduced to a series of numbers? If so what are the best numbers to monitor/count? What is the best/easiset way of capturing the numbers in a manner that is useful to assist ongoing player development?
My view of this is also that if these "numbers" are taken by one person with a clipboard watching the game live, or a past match "player stats" review of a one fixed camera video by one person, then the stats are generally meaningless, one dimentional and can often have a very detrimental effect on team morale.
Rucking Good Stats can probably vouch for the time and effort needed to compile accurate and meaningful stats for a game.
Not all "tackles made" are equal, not all "tackles missed" have meaningful consequences for the team, not all "Rucks attended" contribute to overall team performance.
Can the game be reduced to a series of numbers? If so what are the best numbers to monitor/count? What is the best/easiset way of capturing the numbers in a manner that is useful to assist ongoing player development?