• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Round 6: Reds v. Hurricanes, April 1st

Status
Not open for further replies.
waiopehu oldboy

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
^^^^^^^^^ I made a quick list of suspects but none of them appear to have been "deleted" within the time span of the two "likes" so I'm a bit puzzled.............
 
The torpedo

The torpedo

Peter Fenwicke (45)
RedsHappy said:
It's the anonymised ghost of Link coming back here, just for sentimental reasons.
Click to expand...


force ghost of link.png
 
Shiggins

Shiggins

Simon Poidevin (60)
Wow. The reds are so poor. Jeez I wish the force had the rub of the ref like they did last night but they still couldn't win. Or even get close.

Sent from my SM-G928I using Tapatalk
 
Scoey

Scoey

Tony Shaw (54)
Yeah I had two likes on that post. TOCC and Dan54. Dan's clearly not been deleted so I'd say it's just a glitch if some sort.
 
dru

dru

David Wilson (68)
Gee it's hard not to fall in love with the 'Canes.

Poor Gardner, I dont mind him as a ref, but he's not going to enjoy reviewing his performance on that one. No doubt a number of decissions that even Reds fans were not expecting.

I cant state that game was disappointing. At all. I was entertained throughout and actually had hope for much of the game. No doubt that the Reds need to start performing in terms of wins, especially at home, but I'm not holding that game against them.

I'm liking Tuttle, DP and Hunt a lot. And Higgers. Dont understand some of the comments about Smith and Moore. Those guys are performing and holding things together.

I remain unconvinced with the coaches, but if they keep playing like that I will have to give them the thumbs up.
 
waiopehu oldboy

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
Scoey said:
Yeah I had two likes on that post. TOCC and Dan54. Dan's clearly not been deleted so I'd say it's just a glitch if some sort.
Click to expand...

It's not TOCC either, I found on old post of mine with "TOCC likes this" still attached. Sorry to keep banging on about it, but it's one of those weird things that despite being utterly meaningless I just HAVE to know...........
 
Dismal Pillock

Dismal Pillock

Michael Lynagh (62)
the spambot who managed to brilliantly candiru their way all the way to the "Like" button and push it before a mod axed their little dot dash gilled cock off is probably getting heralded to fuck right now back at SpamBot HQ.

pizza_zpsfrfmwbjx.jpg

"I wrote that one, not you. Speccy dickhead."
 
waiopehu oldboy

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
Nor is it the probable troll who managed to "like" a few posts before getting the bullet on Thursday, roughly two hours after becoming a member. Getting frustrating now, what time's the Tears of Phil Kearns early warning device* set for?

*aka kickoff :)
 
dru

dru

David Wilson (68)
And now I'm going to say something controversial. Ready?

Jake played OK. Some f-ups andsome reasonable stuff.

Not perhaps for a first choice 10, even perhaps as a future possible first choice 10, but for a back up 10 in an Aus Super team. No, he's not my choice, no it's not that I think he's the best available. He is what we've got. He was OK.
 
T

TOCC

Guest
dru said:
And now I'm going to say something controversial. Ready?

Jake played OK. Some f-ups andsome reasonable stuff.

Not perhaps for a first choice 10, even perhaps as a future possible first choice 10, but for a back up 10 in an Aus Super team. No, he's not my choice, no it's not that I think he's the best available. He is what we've got. He was OK.
Click to expand...


Jake's problem is that he plays so robotically, he telegraphs his passes well ahead.. Watch the kiwi 5/8s and halfbacks and they attack the defensive line and engage the defender before passing, Jake catches the ball and then turns his head towards the player he is going to pass to whilst crabbing sideways towards that player.

It does nothing to stop the lateral drift of the defensive line and places pressure on those outside him, by the time he passes defenders have read the pass and are already closing the space.

He played better, but he lacks confidence and he would struggle to stand out in the QPR, his passing game is limited and his kicking game is poor. The only benefit to starting Jake is that it allows Karmichael and Duncan to play in their respective positions.
 
RugbyReg

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
pretty bang on there TOCC. You're point about not standing out in a QPR game was the exact one I had today while watching the 20s GF. McIntyre is solid but he's never going to be the flyhalf you need to win the comp, or win consistently for the exact points you make.

Now, early days, but this young Hamish Stewart looks like a flyhalf. One to watch for sure.
 
cyclopath

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Dismal Pillock said:
Could do with a pole to definitively get to the bottom of this one.

Obviously, some of us support sides that get royally arsefucked up the shitter by the conference system. We may not particularly want to support the useless pricks week in and week out but it's where we're from and what we've always done so, stupidly, we still fuckign do it. Blues and landers already virtually no hope playoff-wise despite having “respectable” records while some tard ranch aussie franchise blunderfucks their way to a cripplefought losing record and hello, here you are Sir’s & Madam’s, a motherfucking home playoff berth.
Click to expand...
Byron, Keats or Shakespeare could not have said it finer!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top