Some observations after watching the game and now looking at the espn stats:
Our "lightwieght" locks get through a huge amount of work: Smith topped the tackle count and m run in the tight 5 with Uru topping distance made in tight across the tight 5 with 21m. With his time on the field Toomaga-Allen defensive rate was slightly higher than Smith.
The defence was not that much more (numerically anyway) than the Chiefs with 166 (successful) to 141. We were simply battering at them and then matching their attack. Given they had over 60% of the territory, and plenty of possession you'd think that the opportunity went the Chiefs way. How did we hold possession - excellent performance in the set piece as a given, but importantly the Chiefs were twice our penalties. Think about that compared to recent years. 5 penalties against the Reds, 10 against the Chiefs.
I'm thinking that the Chiefs were winning the tactical kicking scenario.
Looking at the halves, I'm always interested in active they are on the stats. Ratima (Chief 9) with an incredible 64 passes. Wow. So how did Tate match up? 87 passes!! More than one per minute
. I thought toward the end that some of Tate's passes were getting a little low, but you know, shit.
And the 10s? "Masterclass" McKenzie surely humliated the youngster Lynagh, surely. Nope, Tom with 24.
Now fair enough to McKenzie who does not defend the 10 channel for reasons nothing to do with ability or interest, just because of his ability at the back - add 108 m run to his credentials. Here I am going to compare to our back 3: Vunivalu 110m; Grealy 73m; Campbell 111m. Comparison, Ioane (FB but not for returns) 1m; Stevenson 52m; McKenzie 108m. I don't know, the Chiefs aren't blowing me away here.
Someone else can take a peak at the insane performance of our loose three, and the extroardinary front row. Faessler and the locks (and lifters) in the line out. And our centers.
But that was one hell of a game.