Yeah, I agree. That'd be especially important in a phase two device, in which the RFRs (robot front rowers) have independent movement. Perhaps the robot props would have fixed outer arms as well, to facilitate a realistic bind and apply a realistic force. In a phase three device (where the RFRs are fully robotised) then those outer arms would move. But that is a significantly more complicated machine.
Well it would have to be, wouldn't it? I mean you couldn't have a robotic arm reaching out and tearing off an opposing THPs testicles. All it has to do is squeeze them.
Even simpler, a 12V car battery and a cattle prod attachment - fewer moving parts, and equally effective I'm sure.
Judging by recent French performances its out of order
watch this and it will definetly answer your questions
"just half an hour a week and only a couple of impacts". Marc Lievremont, Head Coach, France
watch this and it will definetly answer your questions
"it accurately replicates twisting and collapsing scrums". What odds Eddie Jones has bought a couple of units for the Japanese pack?
.
"just half an hour a week and only a couple of impacts". Marc Lievremont, Head Coach, France
Yeah, that'll work. Very Gallic approach.
"it accurately replicates twisting and collapsing scrums". What odds Eddie Jones has bought a couple of units for the Japanese pack?