Eyes and Ears
Bob Davidson (42)
The AA foul play overrides the ruck infringments. The Mapimpi foul play was after the try (as you detailed) - how O'Keefe handled this is as per the Law Book.I'm still confused at how O'Keefe handled two 'foul play' incidents.
The Wallabies had multiple penalty advantage in the second half, only for Alan to do a high clean out. O'Keefe overturned our penalty advantage.
Mapimpi scores, gets carded for foul play. But, O'Keefe lets the try stand as the foul play occurred after the try had been scored.
So, what am I missing in terms of why one could be overturned but not the other?