• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Refereeing decisions

Dctarget

Tim Horan (67)
Marler gets 10 weeks for having a fondle of Alan Wyn Jones' plums.

Harsh for Joe but WR (World Rugby) needed to throw the book at him to make a point.
 

molman

Jim Lenehan (48)
Marler gets 10 weeks for having a fondle of Alan Wyn Jones' plums.

Harsh for Joe but WR (World Rugby) needed to throw the book at him to make a point.

I don't think harsh at all. There is no place for this in the game and especially not in an international game telecast to the world. I'm not sure how weeks got knocked off for remorse for a player who is saying the whole thing was 'bollocks' and has a record of such acts in the not too distant past.

What I continue to struggle with is all the rationale for the various adjustments to penalties.

I really don't get this, they did a bad thing but hey they are a great guy. A more transparent incremental penalty system that increases would be better than what we seem to have. They have enough incidents and cases to draw up and communicate a clearer approach to this. Be nice for said approach to then be communicated as the norm for all comp's because there also seems to be some variance between those as well.
 

Dismal Pillock

Michael Lynagh (62)
when I saw Tenured Quiffboy Jordie catch that ball out of bounds and land in bounds I thought no way. Always thought it was out if the ball crossed the plane but damnit the ref and linesman were totally fine with it even though on replay it just looked all kinds of wrong
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
when I saw Tenured Quiffboy Jordie catch that ball out of bounds and land in bounds I thought no way. Always thought it was out if the ball crossed the plane but damnit the ref and linesman were totally fine with it even though on replay it just looked all kinds of wrong

Geez who would of guessed the Refs knew the laws of the game better than us??
Actually thought it show how much Jordie has come on, knew the law obviously!
 

mst

Peter Johnson (47)
Yeah, I was surprised the Refs knew the laws as well. Its Law 18-2-(b) - A player jumps, from within or outside the playing area, and catches the ball, and then lands in the playing area, regardless of whether the ball reached the plane of touch.

I love the way Jaco says its the new law to Cruden; it's been law for a few years now.
 

Dismal Pillock

Michael Lynagh (62)
So how come no player has tried it to such an extent before? Quiffboy was standing about 3 metres out of bounds and knew exactly what he was doing.

Cue away grounds in the Republic to now flood the sideline area with warming-up players, cables, advertising hoardings, bouncy castles, whatever, all while leaving the home team hawf of the field pristinely spartan for the local lads to get a good running jump.

And then, in the 2nd half, move all the detritus down into the other half of the field. "Just a coincidence. It was raining on that half of the field so we just moved the stuff out of the rain."
 

mst

Peter Johnson (47)
Lets face it, its only a small group of players will know the Laws. Even the Refs struggle with them. The Tahs for example certainly won't as they are struggling to remember to catch, pass, run; and that on the rare occasion they trip over the first hurdle and remember to turn up.

I have only seen a few players try it and a few get it right. But typically it would be a frickin BBBBBarrettt that actually managed to do it and in a spectacular way that caught everyone's attention. Showboating! You can tell by his pretty boy haircut.

 

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
My question is why don't they try and lift players to try and intercept the ball when it's kicked for touch on a penalty?

I seem to remember some hoo-ha back in the day when your Nobody was either the jumper or lifter in an attempt to block a shot at goal from a penalty & a resulting Law tweak that applies to both kicks for touch & shots at goal.
 

molman

Jim Lenehan (48)
I seem to remember some hoo-ha back in the day when your Nobody was either the jumper or lifter in an attempt to block a shot at goal from a penalty & a resulting Law tweak that applies to both kicks for touch & shots at goal.

Yep changed some time back.

Otherwise teams would be practicing this :)

mumbai-india-18th-aug-2014-indian-youth-form-a-human-pyramid-to-break-E68XHJ.jpg
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
when I saw Tenured Quiffboy Jordie catch that ball out of bounds and land in bounds I thought no way. Always thought it was out if the ball crossed the plane but damnit the ref and linesman were totally fine with it even though on replay it just looked all kinds of wrong

There was a fair bit of info, I think at the beginning of last year's Super Rugby comp, that the plane of touch had been discarded. I think Jordy was brilliant in this incident and as I understand the new protocols, completely within the laws.
 

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
when I saw Tenured Quiffboy Jordie catch that ball out of bounds and land in bounds I thought no way. Always thought it was out if the ball crossed the plane but damnit the ref and linesman were totally fine with it even though on replay it just looked all kinds of wrong

That's what i thought till the Welsh pulled To'omua's penalty kick back in at the RWC. Mentioned the plane to an Englishman i was with and he looked at me like an idiot.
 
Top