Wilson
Phil Kearns (64)
I agree that they're looking to get Heenan the experience he needs for bigger and better things, but I doubt they'd be looking at Thorn for that sort of DoR role, or that Thorn would be particularly interested in it. For me he's still at a stage where he needs to be coaching, building experience and results and is nowhere near ready to move into a more admin focussed role like that. I could definitely see him looking for an international level assistant role next though, give him a chance to work with a more experienced coach and build on what he's leaned as a head coach.Heenan is probably the wildcard in the Reds setup.
He's had the credentials for a number of years to make the jump into professional coaching, but interesting that he took the opportunity now.
I wouldn't be surprised if the QRU and Thorn are already in discussions to move him into a Rugby/Development Director Role in the next few years, with Heenan coming through to Head Coach.
That's not me saying Heenan is ready, no doubt he's been amazing at the club level. But I am keen to see his impact out of a very well defined setup.
For mine I think there's probably a collection of KPIs/milestones throughout the season they'll be looking for the team to meet, and that'll be the barometer they'll use if they decide to call time on Thorn early. With the world cup at the end of the year I don't think they need to be too quick to make a call - most of the big movement in coaching is as a result of performance there, so there's not necessarily much to gain by going early. It is a bit complicated by who is making the call/driving any potential change - Cordingley or Hanham.