My backline would be:
15 Campbell
14 Petaia
13 Flook
12 Paisami
11 Vunivalu
10 JOC (James O'Connor) (James O'Connor)
9 Tate
Yeh I struggle to see him in my best 23 at the moment.
Daugunu
Petaia
Aubrey
Grealy
Flook (preference at 13)
Campbell (preference at 15)
Are all contracted players I would have ahead of him. And Joey Fittock looks the goods, I'd have him there as well. I'd also be looking at Matt Garland from Easts as 13/winger cover, but he wasn't selected for any of the Challenger stuff so they mustn't be keen.
There are very few Reds backs who don't possess this trait.Daugunu is such a streaky player as well. Does some absolutely amazing things, then does one or two stupid things to undo it all.
I'm not hugely comfortable with the degree of involvement and 'sports-washing' from Santos, but I can't really begrudge the Reds for taking the sponsorship either. I also wouldn't be against individual players taking a stand against it ala Pat Cummins. That said I probably have a bigger issue with players promoting NFTs than any individual team sponsorship the reds have at the moment.There has been a lot of talk in the media recently about sponsorships of teams and whether the product they are selling is an important consideration before their money is accepted.
Do any Reds fans have issues with our sponsors?
The issue with Netball Australia is interesting, and one of my first thoughts was can we get the money for Rugby instead.
For me, I don't really care who the sponsor is, I just want the funding to support Rugby as a whole and think that if the product is legal then go for it.
If I had to choose what I don't like the most it would be gambling advertising but I realise that this can be an incredible source of money so can live with it.
I'm going back to the future here - I think Petaia showed far more actual promise as a 13 - is an average winger and it was pie in the sky to see him as a FB.
9. Mcdermott 10. JOC (James O'Connor) (James O'Connor) 11. Daugunu 12. Paisami 13. Petaia 14. Vunivalu 15. Campbell
21. Thomas 22. Creighton 23. Flook
He also has shown that, on the wing for both the Reds and Wallabies, he can consistently get over the try line if the opportunity presents itselfI think there is too much value in a centre combo of either Paisami/Flook/Henry to squeeze Petaia back there by choice.
No doubt there will be some injuries so Petaia will likely get another shot though.
Agree, if the company is producing / selling a legal product then it is up to an Individual to decide if they want it or not for THEMSELF.There has been a lot of talk in the media recently about sponsorships of teams and whether the product they are selling is an important consideration before their money is accepted.
Do any Reds fans have issues with our sponsors?
The issue with Netball Australia is interesting, and one of my first thoughts was can we get the money for Rugby instead.
For me, I don't really care who the sponsor is, I just want the funding to support Rugby as a whole and think that if the product is legal then go for it.
If I had to choose what I don't like the most it would be gambling advertising but I realise that this can be an incredible source of money so can live with it.
That said I probably have a bigger issue with players promoting NFTs than any individual team sponsorship the reds have at the moment.
I'm going back to the future here - I think Petaia showed far more actual promise as a 13 - is an average winger and it was pie in the sky to see him as a FB.
9. Mcdermott 10. JOC (James O'Connor) (James O'Connor) 11. Daugunu 12. Paisami 13. Petaia 14. Vunivalu 15. Campbell
21. Thomas 22. Creighton 23. Flook
My memory may be failing me, but didn't we do just that and play Grealy at fullback and Petaia on the wing in a game or two last season?anyways how that relates to reds… we are one Jock Campbell injury away from Petaia playing 15 again. There’s certainly not any better options for fullback… I wouldn’t be playing Aubrey or Grealy ahead of Petaia.
Too many exist as "pump and dump" schemes, exploiting popularity amongst celebrity to artificially inflate their value before the initial buyers cash out. To be clear I don't think players are fully aware of this and stand to potentially be victims of it as well, but that doesn't change the fact that it's their celebrity being leveraged to effectively scam people out of their money.sorry to go down this vortex but why the hate on NFTs? They don’t hurt anyone… I think they are pointless paying for a jpg when a screenshot is sufficient.
sorry to go down this vortex but why the hate on NFTs? They don’t hurt anyone… I think they are pointless paying for a jpg when a screenshot is sufficient.
All the simps who "invested" in Lana Rhoades' NFT pump and dump can claim that they once got f""ked by a porn star too.
On topic: Reds program yielding few and underperforming wallabies needs serious looking into by Rugby Australia right now?
Great to see a few QPR guys getting there shot, particularly with an extra warm up game. Really feel for Dobbins though, he was in such good form at just the right time before the injury.