We are two years into what everyone thought was a five year experiment. It's way too early to be talking about sacking someone who is clearly rebuilding not only reds rugby but Qld rugby in general.
A big part of long term appointments is assessments of KPIs at regular intervals and acting on them. Depending on how far off the KPIs the coach or team are determines the level adjustment that is required. That could mean sacking the coach or hiring new ones or whatever.
I have no idea what KPIs that have been set, but I would imagine remaining at the bottom half of the log and perpetual "rebuilding phase" for the foreseeable future isnt one of them.
As to your other post, correlation does not equal causation. It is more likely that historically poor coaching appointments and rubbish talent identification has been responsible for periods of high coach turnover as to just sacking coaches on a whim.
The fact that the reds stuck with Richard F. Graham for so many seasons shows that the qru know how to remain faithful to a coach through lean times.
The problem is that the qru have historically not been an organisation capable of managing their appointments. The level of shitshow they have exhibited in the past is literally beyond belief.
Dunno what they are doing right now, but the assembly of the new coaching outfit looks really good, and Brad Thorns team this year was a lot better this year than last in terms of how they played.
They have to win though, it's unacceptable to keep losing and that needs to be a factor in whether he stays or goes in the near future.