Fair, but this must be the thinking.
Lucas is only a 10.
Hardy only a 15.
I've seen Lucas play 10, 12, 13 and 15 at club and above.
Don't know why he is only a 10.
Jack Hardy seems to have played a few positions too
Fair, but this must be the thinking.
Lucas is only a 10.
Hardy only a 15.
I've seen Lucas play 10, 12, 13 and 15 at club and above.
Don't know why he is only a 10.
Jack Hardy seems to have played a few positions too
If the reds forwards let go of it. There is a genuine chance for uncontested scrums in this match.
I think it’s fairly obvious it is their natural positions respectively, I can’t be bothered with semantics about professional rugby players abilities to play other positions.
Nah I don’t think so, the Reds will be dominate, but the Tahs would have spent the whole bye week working out how to fix it. Crusaders beat the Reds at scrum time last week so that rebutts the notion of the Reds being the best scrum in the comp.If the reds forwards let go of it. There is a genuine chance for uncontested scrums in this match.
wow.
nice contribution
Penalty try might be a great option at the TAB
why is it obvious that that is their position.
Has Pocock ever played centre or hooker at the open level? I'd never consider him that. THis all seems a bizare argument.
Not sure why Lucas isn’t at 10 if we are going to play him.
why is it obvious that that is their position.
Has Pocock ever played centre or hooker at the open level? I'd never consider him that. THis all seems a bizare argument.
So is this Lucas bloke in the Beale mold?
Ball player that covers 10, 12 and 15 i guess. Only player i can think off that covers those 3.In what way?
I reckon Ben's best position in pro rugby was 22. And that's not at all a criticsm.wasn't Ben's best position at 9?