TSR, I get what you say, and we have even seen posters banned for following player obsessions. (Remember KAO pointman?)
My response isn't even over this specific, but having some tolerance to dissenting views. We see now TOCC restraining comment on WBs threads because his view doesn't follow the "sheeple" narrative. I had already stopped commenting, restraining to "like" when it made sense, but with critics withdrawing I'm posting again.
There is also an issue with courtesy, so here on the Reds forum, I'm happy to state, for instance, that I think Foley is an WB error and that Quade is a far superior 10, even in 2017. But courtesy suggests I leave it alone at the Waratahs, and these days WB discussions. Same same, Hanigan I will comment on at the WBs (hasn't reached the respect level that Foley has yet) but wouldn't do it on the Waratahs thread.
OTOH a long term Red like Scrubber critics Quade here and I don't have a problem (don't agree, but as along term Red he's entitled to his expression).
Here at the Reds, it's pleasing that BR took your point and agreed to tone it down on Simmo. I hope he continues expression in threads such as the WBs etc.
Just my 2c, but I think it's a retrograde step when critics are excessively targeted on an opinion forum. There is always the "ignore" button.