I wonder how the full and thorough review is going?
The NRC support structures are stacked with the inner circle so I doubt there will be any changes or progress.
I know Graham wouldn't sack himself, but how could any review of they teams overall performance and defence then turn around and say he is remotely qualified to be involved.
Likewise injuries were the number one excuse used all year, yet there won't be any changes to the overall coaching staff in terms of program management or the physical preparation staff.
Some sort of movement would suggest that they are at least paying attention. An unchanged structure suggests a head in the sand mentality.
Teams need to be proactive. I always come back to the difference between the Force and the Reds in terms of Physical preparation staff hires.
Marsh left the Reds and Richardson and his band of interns got the gig. No search, not even a process for "show". Under-qualified coaches were used to fill gaps as they were cheap, while some very qualified coaches around the traps don't get a look in.
The Force on the other hand had their #1 S&C guy leave a few years back. Their #2 was incredibly well regarded and qualified. Everyone thought he'd walk into the role.
Instead, a search brought over a coach from England, keeping the #2 in the #2 role despite being one of the most qualified in the entire country.
That wasn't enough though and they went and got David Joyce back from Europe to head up an entire program. So a guy who would rightly head up any program anywhere was sitting at #3.
At the Reds our head coach is employed because his best mate sits on the board. Our physical prep staff are there because they work cheap. We don't have a single staff member in that core 5-6 who'd get a run with the Force in their current set up.
I've always used that as a metric for players, but it applies to coaches too.