Scrubber2050
Mark Ella (57)
No. Just don't fuck players off without a viable alternative. Who should we look at signing at the expense of James Horwill?
And since EOD is considered subpar, who are 2 players we should sign that are both better than James? Because you are saying he shouldn't even be our reserve lock.
Players should be kept until you have a better option. That's professionalism, not throwing the fucking baby out with the fucking bath water.
Only if the fucking baby doesn't fit in the fucking bathtub.
I am not having a go at anybody in particular. It is just that James, for whatever reason is not performing to the high levels (he set for himself) Same has been said for Genia. No-one is immune from the realities of modern rugby. In particular I acknowledge the wonderful service Horwill has given to his State - that is just undeniable.
I don't know who you could replace say, whoever with. I would think the process would be that the decision needs to be made first, then "feelers" put out there in the marketplace for the player believed to be a better option. If no better option is available then obviously you stick with what you've got.
Doesn't this occur all the time at all Franchises. Players get too old and or lack performances and then are "tapped" on the shoulder for another player.