W
What2040
Guest
McDuling is a very strong ball carrier who, from the handful of games of his that I have seen, rarely goes backwards. This included last years Qld A games against the Pacific Island teams who dominated the Qld team when it came to the collision zone.
He could easily be a Brad Thorn type 2nd Row or a strong running 6. (I prefer the 2nd Row option for McDuling as he is similar in height and width to Thorn and needs some serious gym time to provide further power to even come close to matching Thorn).
Defensively he is solid and can hold down the blindside, and in attack he carries the ball well and hits rucks hard. For me I would prefer this style of player for the Reds right now. This year at times (usually the critical times) the Reds have lost the collision zone and started to creep sideways in attack. Yes Quade wasnt there but the platform wasnt being set by the forwards. Daley who was awesome in 2011 was missing as was Simmons for much of the year.
Other options for 6 is Wallace-Harrison but his longevity will be cut short by the extra running required from the 6 position.
To even put McDuling in the same sentence as Thorn is a joke - surely. Thorn was one of the greatest exponents of the game of rugby and probably rugby league as well. I would even be as bold to say that he was a better and more valuable player than Eales. Shit, did I say that !!!!!!