Tex
Greg Davis (50)
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-...de-with-three-inclusions-20180321-p4z5gj.html
It's looking like a more balanced back row.
A bit early to be naming the team but fair play, pin the colours to the wall and go for it
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-...de-with-three-inclusions-20180321-p4z5gj.html
It's looking like a more balanced back row.
Was there a sponsorship thread? Or was that my imagination? Reality is a little fluid these days but I’m pretty sure there was.
Meakes starting. I wonder if that will finally make someone happy?
For his sake, I hope Meakes has a good game!
Meakes starting. I wonder if that will finally make someone happy?
It was only a short term thread.
Strange that’s the first time I’ve ever seen or heard of a short term thread on GAGR. I guess when you don’t like the opinion of others you let them share those opinions then delete them, hoping that In deleting the bytes it’s also somehow expunged from their consciousness.It was only a short term thread.
Strange that’s the first time I’ve ever seen or heard of a short term thread on GAGR. I guess when you don’t like the opinion of others you let them share those opinions then delete them, hoping that In deleting the bytes it’s also somehow expunged from their consciousness.
It’s getting a bit tiresome for us but I’m sure there is massive satisfaction when delete is pressed so that makes the censorship worthwhile.
daz it started facetiously but there's pretty case for keeping it, perhaps sans the troll-y content?
I actually agree with TOCC and others - it's an important issue and is worth discussing. What shits me is that a bit of friendly banter and discussion about the players and the team gets derailed on a weekly basis by the same questions from the same people, hence the focused thread. Anyway, it's not a die-in-the-ditch thing, just an irritation.
Shiggins! Time to front up mate. Your calls have been heard and the great man Wessels has green-lighted (lit?) your boy Meakes.
Sponsorship thread, short term thread, short term sponsorship. Ah well, humour was not my strong point.
The conversation can be had on a number of Places in this forum, it really doesn’t need it’s own home.
And it’s ripe for toxicity, which had already started to play out. So, I closed it. Why? Because I can.
Anything else I can help you with?
IIRC the Rebels had Rabodirect as their major sponsor for 5 years until the end of 2015 and have not had one since.
I am aware that Super Rugby operates in a weird and self restricting marketplace. Having 8 home games, 4 others domestically out of 19 (and very limited chance of home finals to market off) and a limited pay TV audience all make attracting sponsors difficult and limit the value. However all the other current franchises have managed to secure majors sponsors each season.
It begs the question about the both the marketplace (Melbourne / Victoria) and the product (Rebels); are the Rebels marketable, relevant and a realistic viable commercial product?
And getting 10,000* at every game at the same time then sign a multi year deal with the higher rate to make up for half a season more with no sponsor? Makes some sense. Sort of betting on the 2 birds in the bush coming in.My very uninformed guess is that the Rebels are rolling the dice here a bit and hoping that they'll get a few more wins on the board. A team that's won 5 games out of the opening 6 is a lot more attractive to sponsor than one that finished last season with 2 wins.