• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Rebels 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoMelbRebels

Nicholas Shehadie (39)
Considering our injury list, it's quite impressive - the backs especially. We could (will) probably struggle at scrum time. Of course, we always seem to have a late team change on the day with someone not making it, but if we can keep this list, we have shot, at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daz

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
I presume neither of the franchises has yet had a chance to put their case before the ARU. So, are you saying that the decision really has already been taken and that the consultative process is just window dressing. If so, where do you get that information?
 

Highlander35

Steve Williams (59)
Hooray for Vagueness.

I'd agree with you BR, if it were anyone but RL, or maybe if Daz had heard it from Mitch's mouth after a night of sweet tender lovemaking.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Highlander35

Steve Williams (59)
More or less

1163236_1.jpg
 

KevinO

Geoff Shaw (53)
It's long,

The following is a statement from the Melbourne Rebels Rugby Union Pty Limited board and management:

Not on our Watch

The Melbourne Rebels Rugby Union (MRRU) deny the right of the Australian Rugby Union (ARU) to “cut or chop” the Melbourne Rebels from the Super Rugby Competition. MRRU expresses great disappointment in the manner in which the matter has been managed and immediately calls on the ARU to publicly state that MRRU can not and is not being ‘cut or chopped’ from the Super Rugby Competition and advise the public that it had no right to say it could do this or to ‘request the Melbourne Rebels to ‘make its case’.

Legal position

Last Sunday evening, ARU Chair Cameron Clyne advised MRRU Chair Jonathan Ling that the ARU had decided to reduce the Australian representation from five to four teams and, further, that the Brumbies were ‘safe’ and that either the Rebels or the Force would be “cut”. This was contrary to advice that MRRU had previously received from ARU management.

We unequivocally reject that the ARU has any ability to “chop” or “cut” (ARU words) the Melbourne Rebels Super Rugby licence. Any representation by the ARU, including its Chairman, to that effect is legally incorrect and in complete conflict with the constitution of the ARU. The ARU’s continued use of these terms and perpetuation of this myth continues to cause significant damage to MRRU and its players and staff.

Despite being advised of its inability to “chop” MRRU, the ARU proceeded down this path thereby knowingly causing significant additional damage to MRRU – its players, coaches and stakeholders.

MRRU is steadfast in its stance that the Australian Rugby Union (ARU) does not have the legal right to ‘cut’ MRRU from the competition and that MRRU is in full compliance with the requirements of its Super Rugby Participation Deed. Further, MRRU will continue to perform all of its responsibilities to the Australian Rugby Union under its licence, and fully expects the Australian Rugby Union to do the same.

MRRU notes, and is very disappointed to hear and read statements that the board and senior management of the ARU did not believe for many years in the 5 team model and did not believe that model was financially viable. MRRU notes that this concern was not conveyed to Imperium Sports Management prior to its acquisition of MRRU despite the full board and management of the ARU having the opportunity to do so.

Patently through no fault of our own MRRU has suffered significant damage (financial, reputational, commercial and personal) by the ARU’s handling of this whole process and its unnecessary public statements and actions. Given these actions MRRU has notified the ARU of its intention to seek compensation and at this time has reserved all rights.

Support of our Fans and Stakeholders

MRRU would like to acknowledge the unwavering support it has received from the club’s members, fans and commercial partners during this unsatisfactory decision-making process.

MRRU is disappointed that its staff, players, members, fans and partners have suffered anguish and emotional distress.

MRRU appreciates all the support it has received from Victoria, Australia and around the World. MRRU acknowledges the frustration of some of its fans and social media followers and apologises for that perceived lack of communication while MRRU has been confirming its legal rights. With MRRU’s position now firmly established MRRU will be very public in its stance.

Rebels and the Victorian Rugby Union

MRRU, in conjunction with the Victorian Rugby Union (VRU), is totally committed to supporting the development and growth of rugby from grassroots to elite levels.

MRRU notes the ongoing support of the VRU and its President and Eminent QC (Quade Cooper), Tim North, who said:

“The VRU is strongly committed to its partnership with MRRU and its objectives of growing the game in Victoria and a successful Super Rugby Licencee in Melbourne is critical to that realisation.”

Ironically while the ARU has been looking to “chop” the MRRU team, rugby in Victoria has never been healthier. We have experienced unprecedented growth in participation, development and national success. And the MRRU’s and VRU’s commitment to rugby’s development pathways is yielding results with a record six home-grown players contracted to the Rebels this season and a record 10 Rebels named in the 2017 Australian U20s squad.

MRRU also wants to publicly acknowledge the Premier Daniel Andrews, Treasurer Tim Pallas, Sports Minister John Eren and their teams for their support of the MRRU and Victorian Rugby in general and specifically thoroughout this whole unnecessary and damaging saga.

ARU Broadcast Money

MRRU reluctantly accepts that the ARU board has voted to reduce the number of Super Rugby teams but it does not accept that the ARU arbitrarily takes the surplus funds ($6.0m) resulting from this decision.

This money is generated by the Super Rugby licencees and should be going back to the Super Rugby licence holders on an equal basis to ensure that they can be financially independent going forward – a stated ARU objective.

Growth of the game at all levels relies heavily on the success and sustainability of the Super Rugby teams and with their success will come greater participation and a profile for the game. The ARU has substantial revenue outside of this broadcast money and a judicious and unbiased allotment of this money will be sufficient to fund the direct investment they wish to allocate to the grassroots level of the game.

Competition Structure

The ARU has made it clear that Super Rugby is not delivering for the fans or viewers and the teams are all financially marginal. MRRU is disappointed that SANZAAR and the ARU did not use the strategic review as an opportunity to ensure that all teams played each other once by simply extending the Super Rugby Competition by two (2) more rounds, this could easily be fitted into the existing schedule by playing two rounds during the four week test window with limited impact.

This additional content would also be welcomed by the broadcaster, would make the competition fairer and importantly assist the Super Rugby teams with more opportunities to engage with fans and sponsors. We all want more Super Rugby not less, and we all want a fairer draw.

MRRU immediately requests the ARU to put an end to this ongoing saga and to allow the Australian rugby community and our Rebels Family, including players, staff, families, members, fans and stakeholders, to focus on rugby without further unwarranted distraction and mitigate any further damage.

We sincerely thank you for your ongoing support of the Club through this time and we look forward to seeing you at our home game against the Brumbies, tomorrow night at AAMI Park.
 

stoff

Trevor Allan (34)
So it's 'are you repudiating out contract cause it damn well sounds like you are?' Wonder how long the version of this delivered to the ARU gave them. Tipping not long


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

lou75

Ron Walden (29)
I think his point is totally valid re: if you knew 5 teams were unsustainable , why didn't you tell me before I bought in?
 

oztimmay

Tony Shaw (54)
Staff member
I've read that letter 5 times over, and the smile gets bigger and bigger.

You reckon Puliver and Clyne are having trouble walking around at the moment?

I feel much better now. Still not over, but feel much better now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

GoMelbRebels

Nicholas Shehadie (39)
Same, Tim, very well-worded and inclusive of all members of the Rebels family.

Still, I feel there is a ways to go yet.
 

Rebels3

Jim Lenehan (48)
I've read that letter 5 times over, and the smile gets bigger and bigger.

You reckon Puliver and Clyne are having trouble walking around at the moment?

I feel much better now. Still not over, but feel much better now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Completely agree with the smile

I actually strangely have some sympathy for them. They have both inherited a governing body that has little to no say on certain aspects of their own subsectors. NSWRU, QRU, etc are all run like companies who are competitors and not companions. The governing body seems to be able to suggest but not implement strategies, yet these companion companies all stick their hand out for money, almost like a moody teenager doesnt listen to what his/her parents say. Now obviously the ARU have shown a fairly decent level of incompetence, however 50% of this mess is the ARUs fault the other 50% is the politically filled state bodies, who will all probably get out of the fiasco unscathed
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
So the statement asserts that cutting the Rebels (any other franchise?) is unconstitutional but doesn't anywhere I can see give detail of how or in which aspects such a move is unconstitutional. Can anyone elaborate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top