Why?
His Test form for the past 18 months is ordinary at best.
If the issue is his commercial value to the Reds, shouldn't the Reds be responsible for that?
Or should the other franchises subsidise the Reds?
Why?
His Test form for the past 18 months is ordinary at best.
If the issue is his commercial value to the Reds, shouldn't the Reds be responsible for that?
Or should the other franchises subsidise the Reds?
Scotty - how does it demonstrably benefit WA or Victoria, for instance? I think Quade Cooper is an asset best kept in rugby in Oz, but I struggle a little with Quade=good for Qld = more supporters and players in Qld = good for everyone else = should be paid more by the ARU for all the positivity he brings. Ultimately, he carries baggage, much of which he packed himself.
The complete lack of a real offer is, in my mind, churlish on the part of the ARU, but he has to prove his value on the field, not as a sales pitch. I hope he does.
Scotty - how does it demonstrably benefit WA or Victoria, for instance? I think Quade Cooper is an asset best kept in rugby in Oz, but I struggle a little with Quade=good for Qld = more supporters and players in Qld = good for everyone else = should be paid more by the ARU for all the positivity he brings. Ultimately, he carries baggage, much of which he packed himself.
The complete lack of a real offer is, in my mind, churlish on the part of the ARU, but he has to prove his value on the field, not as a sales pitch. I hope he does.
So you don't think the Reds and QRU's success has an influence on rugby outside of Queensland? You think all this increase in playing and supporter numbers in Qld over the last few years only affects rugby in one state?
Years too late, but he should sack Khoder Nasser now. That 1 year contract aint looking too clever now is it?