Haha. I did not mean that there isn't one person in the 1st 15 that didn't attend the junior school at churchie. But I will have a crack at your multi choice quiz. I would say 4 out of the starting 15 have been attending Churchie since grade 7. There you go. I would guess in last years team there is perhaps even less. My original post was to highlight how ordinary the Churchie under age teams are going. Under 13 A's on Saturday lost by 67 points. The 14 A's had nearly 50 racked up against them. I wonder if any of these players will get to play 1st 15. Or will you just import new players from Townsville at grade 11 or 12.
But that's what you first said.
And now the goal posts of your critique have shifted to 'being at Churchie since Y7', that is the new 'acceptable homegrown threshold'.
The hard fact of the matter is that the majority of QLD GPS schools offer rugby and multiple other sports and academic scholarships.
Spitting on one - any - GPS school with wild and grossly inaccurate statements re their level of sports scholarships lacks rigour and maturity and gradually turns these otherwise excellent GAGR threads into a toxic, downward-spiralling amalgam of sour grapes and petty hate. (Just as does judging a school's whole junior program on one year's 'A' team results. To make that assessment you would need to carefully trend analyse say 3-5 years of results, both absolutely and comparatively. Once that analysis is done, let's talk some more.)
Worse, it lacks generosity to the many fine young rugby players that have been right through a school's junior program and who do great work in the Opens.
Finally, I can say that I am very proud of Churchie's scholarship boys in terms of their contribution to the school overall; their general conduct is excellent inside and outside rugby and they make good contributions to the school not only in rugby, they very clearly appreciate being in the school and I would guess this is just as true of scholarship boys in most if not all other GPS schools.