"But in all honesty, Riley is as good as what everyone is saying. However TSS do have downfalls. Their tight 5 only decide to rock up at scrum time and BGS schooled them in lineouts with TSS not even winning one to my understanding. They also play there second rows on the wing. And their back 3 has not been proven."
In regards to IGS, they play the same footy everyone has seen at IGS for years. Some big big heffa's up front who will barge in all day but structurely the become isolated and try to have a dick measuring contest. Any coach who knows what will easily exploit their big pack and their lack of technical nous.
Churchie are similar to IGS just with a few more brains and some more dangerous outside backs.
The only team that has impressed me in terms of structural play and all round game is the nudge. Do not worry about depth there, they'll pull nelson akufelatu'mata out from the 12D weighing in at 140kg to fill in the backline.
Getwithme,
Yesterday at 11:28 PM Report
I agree with just about everything you have said GetwithMe. I re-watched the BBC v TSS game paying particular attention to the tight 5 and back-row. I think I have figured out some of the "switch-off" I had previously mentioned.
The back row does not play as a unit. Pere played outside the outside centre which is so unusual? Was he there to defend? If he was he was too slow to do so. His input/work rate in the back row is too low compared to say Hewat, McReight and Wallis. Angus Allen had a very good game; but that said he is not as dynamic if the pack is not going forward. The #6 is thereabouts and is sometimes there and other times not.
The commitment to the ruck is not as good as say BBC, Churchie or NC. This is a tight 5 issue. The lineout was good but the scrum was so "up and down". This is either a lack of concentration and in some instances the second row "riding up". Whilst this is not all negative, they need to be switch-on for NC and Churchie because neither of these teams will leave any room for uncertainty or "potential tardiness in play".
Will watch the TGS game and give more opinion. On the positive side the #10 and #13 are very dangerous, but line speed and supporting the backs with an active back row may nullify some of their play.
Love the IGS and Churchie analogies!! So apt, but maybe a little crude, but you got my chuckle.