Nothing was being put to any vote, Sage and I do agree with some of what you say re : The National Focus of Rugby and the greater number of participants relative to any other team sport at GPS Schools.
I am not suggesting that Rugby , Rowing and Track and Field are a package deal in where they sit in the GPS Sporting Calendar but they are complementary in where they sit and I don't believe this is without design.
For what its worth , I note New Zealand schools run Rowing in Term 1 and Rugby in Term 2 , and , for boys in Senior School ( academically ) there is probably a lot to be said for getting their primary sporting commitments out of the way in the first part of the year.
I am not sure about your point in where you see the benefit to Term 2 ? Correct me if I am wrong but I thought it was to do with selection disadvantage in GPS /QLD/Australian Schoolboy Trials ? That more QLD GPS Boys would be selected if they were playing their Rugby Term 2 ?
Maybe incrementally.
But first of all , QLD has always been well represented
Secondly , and generally speaking, the right talent is identified across 1 and 2 Teams at QLD and Australian Schoolboy levels. On a broader level I trust that the talent net works well - Jake McIntyre being picked up from Alstonville High a couple of years ago is a great example of this.
Thirdly , The Australian Schools representative season as administered by the ARU runs September / October - so therefore , in reverse , QLD GPS Boys that make it through maybe at a higher game playing advantage when the Australian Schools campaign starts . The best example of this I can think of is a couple of years ago when Jonah Placid and Lolo Fakaosilea were the two standouts with genuine game winning plays in the Australian Schools victory over New Zealand schools in New Zealand - the first time Australian Schools had beaten New Zealand Schools in New Zealand for god knows how long .
And I'm sure God , otherwise known as Hugh Jarse , could tell us.
Lastly , and I'm sure this will come as a complete shock to many , GPS Schools and their Heads of Sport / Co- Curricular , do not orientate their Schools around one singular endeavour . And because they don't this is why they won't change their whole program to suit one sport because of a school of thought it would ' work better" for that sport in how it syncs and relates to how that sport is administered by other external bodies.
I can assure you they couldn't care less . And even moreso to the extent it disrupts a carefully planned whole curriculum offering