Guys, the preceding few posts have absolutely no business in this thread. When will you get the message that it will not be tolerated?
Vegas and
Digby you guys may be relatively new to this forum but there is a protocol we follow and I find it quite disturbing that you blatantly disregarded the rules. The fact that all your evidence is hearsay and that you are picking out individual players does not add any quality to the thread whatsoever. Take it elsewhere and find some factual evidence - it was not so long ago that these threads were clogged with similar BS that nearly resulted in the end of schoolboy forums.
As for
TheKing (and to a lesser extent
Knockers), you guys have been around here long enough to know better. I hate to be the fun police but I know you guys have more substantial contributions than the last few posts. Don't drag yourselves into this mess cause it will just end in cards.
Lighten up Light - apologies for offending if my
response to a post in this thread ( or "blatant disregard of the rules " ) about a player and team and situation that will impact week in and week out on the field offended you. Everyone's sensitivity reflects how stupid all of this has become. Its unfortunately part of the game now, and needs to be discussed contextually rather than theoretically in the other thread.
I did take it elsewhere if you read the other threads, and the evidence you seek is on the fields every weekend. I will concede and take it elsewhere, and this thread can continue to ignore the influence this programme is having on the field.
I will let you guys talk about the games - you obviously know what you're talking about.
No worries King _ will do - I will take the battle up elsewhere.
[Excellent - LG]
And for relevance for this thread - BSGS by 9, Churchie by 7, GT by 7 and a close tussle at Southport - TSS haven't been tested and haven't looked as good as everyone is saying