LIKEATIGER
Stan Wickham (3)
GPS backrow made the difference big mobile and hard to stop
Crickets from Tigers supporters on this matter?For confidence to be maintained in the qru judiciary the questions over Perese must be answered formally and openly .players ,coaches and clubs are confused. Was the referee's initial decision deemed incorrect or did the judiciary believe missing part of 1 game was enough.
Crickets from Tigers supporters on this matter?
He definitely played GPS - watched it personally. He's also on the team sheet as a try scorer.Did Perese definitely play the following week? Or was he in the programme but not actually take the field?
Nope - it WAS Perese who was marched off.The only thing I can think of is that on their team sheet abother player has been named at 13, when Perese was wearing that number on the day. The Referee would have written his report as per the number worn not by name.
Wow - well, I've got nothing then.He definitely played GPS - watched it personally. He's also on the team sheet as a try scorer.
Thanks for clarifying - Paty did the Norths boys front the same judiciary? I know you said provisional suspension, but I thought you might have heard some further info?