Lee Grant
John Eales (66)
Seems like the NSW selectors picked those they thought were good players regardless of the team they played in.
That's how it should be I suppose, but sometimes there is a hard to pick ability for some players to play in a team way and if they come together in a school or a school group and the teams they play for show a strong team ability, then those players should get clipboard marks for that attribute.
It's the same in senior rugby. I thought the RWC 2003 England forwards were good individually but their ability to combine in all aspects of forward play was remarkable. They made restarts and mauls look like set pieces and they even chimed into breakdowns by the numbers.
As I said: it's an attribute that's hard to pick. In the case of the 2003 England team it was a process of discarding players of the previous 2 years who were less good in that area, or not so coachable. That process can never apply to the selection of state schools teams; nevertheless I think the NSW Is team will miss not having the teamwork of the GPS Is pack.
It's the opposite story in the backs: NSW Is has retained all the ISA backs as a unit, except that Hulme from GPS is on one wing. This is less objectionable as the ISA backs were in raging form against CHS; but they had good ball that day. One can only wonder what this same backline would do behind the GPS pack.
The midfield of Purcell and Hingano is a dynamite pairing with good ball, which they didn't get against CAS, but you could argue that the GPS pairing of Apo and Ingate was unlucky not to be chosen instead. Perhaps the selectors have done the right think in keeping the ISA backline intact (almost); though with different selectors in a parallel universe they could have been intact for the Twos instead of the Ones.
One thing for sure: there was no value in breaking up either midfield.
.