M
magpie52
Guest
Auggies 24 Riverview 19
Oakhill 19 Joeys 17
Oakhill 19 Joeys 17
Auggies 24 Riverview 19
Oakhill 19 Joeys 17
I see Joeys were done by a good oak hill team.
What I don't get, at least over the last several years, is how complete dominance across 90% of joeys teams doesn't translate to success at the top grade
Oak hill has 6 teams in the opens to joeys 13
It must be something joeys isn't doing as opposed to something they are doing?!
Take for example joeys doesn't seem to do tours, the trial match process how does that work . The athletes just swan into their pre ordained spots?
Not sure but must be some change needed . Otherwise be same result.
Either way think this years comp is going to be a great one . With scots not to be as dominant as they were in 2014 imho
Who were the standouts for the joeys boys? Unlucky loss for them, thought they would have had the game in the bag but I guess they are just coming together for the first time since the Athletics season!Oakhill were good; Joeys were poor today in execution. The only change they need to make has already been made by moving Athletics to term 3. Combinations were a bit rusty for sure and the team should change next week otherwise it will be a long season.
Joeys had momentum in second half but didn't capitalise through errors and good defence from Oakhill. Couple of forwards missing could have provided more grit to the forwards. I hope next week is better.
Auggies 24 Riverview 19
Oakhill 19 Joeys 17
Who were the standouts for the joeys boys? Unlucky loss for them, thought they would have had the game in the bag but I guess they are just coming together for the first time since the Athletics season!
Where did Clements play? 15?No stand outs.
Gittoes, Horton, Anderson were solid in forwards. Clements solid. Everyone else rusty as expected. Next week will see a big improvement.
I would trial Dylan Grant and Jaffer-Williams, both looked good in seconds.
Poorly.How did grammar go against pats?
No wonder he was the Oz Schools run-on scrumhalf at 16 years-old.
Further to my post above (#431) we need more trial information about Newington and Scots.