T
The Big Marn
Guest
IMHO the Scots 3rds and 2nds coaches have good playing pedigrees (recent), both are teachers at the school, and have the ability to relate well to their players. Not a struck match between them in coaching ability. Would not be out of place as 1sts coaches. Both are ex-forwards, a significant plus in the development of their rugby nous.
There seems to be a school policy of promotions and injury replacements for 4ths to replace into 2nds and 3rds to move into 1sts. If so, that could account for the disparity between 3rds and 2nds.
I think the turning point appeared to be the downfall at the start of the 2nds game. The thirds had a relatively slop free game, even on a moist track. 2nds weren't so lucky. Although it does seem to have been a trend that the 3s have picked up victories where the 2s have lost i.e. Kings. Perhaps a coaching factor or the team make up. I would dispute the 4ths to 2nds, 3rds to 1sts 'policy', it has been the case one or two times due to location differences, but certainly not the case in most team changes.