Hi there, long time reader, first time poster. Personally I think that both the claims that Shore should be relegated and that Scots are cheats are completely outrageous.
Firstly, Shore's loss this weekend was their first loss of over thirty points or more the whole season, they have consistently been in the game every week except yesterday. This was a combination of injuries (mainly suffered on the Gold Coast tour), an absolutely firing Scots side and quite frankly a poor showing by the Shore boys. Also if Shore were to be relegated, that would mean the 2nds would be playing in the 4ths competition? The Shore 2nds are a quality side, would by no means 'pump' the 1sts but would absolutely destroy any 4ths side in the competition. Parallels to High and Grammar can only be made when Shore is losing EVERY game by at least 50, something I can't see happening anytime in the future.
Shore have been very unlucky this season, that is it, plain and simple. Unfortunately they were on the end of a rampaging Scots on the weekend. Scots rugby is a force to be reckoned with. Impeccable structure running right throughout their sides, apparent in the 16 A's yesterday that I thought could've had a good crack at Shore 1sts. It was disappointing to see the Shore boys drop their heads so quickly yesterday, as the score line doesn't reflect their abilities or their ticker.
Hope to see more discussion about rugby and who played well rather than just outlandish claims in this forum.