feeling this should be said again, do u think that its appropriate to notice that both schools that the most Aus. schoolboy representatives have 'fallen behind' so to speak and not preformed well enough respectively in their GPS teams and/or got injured due to the amount of gameplay and training they have been given?? If Newington had the amount of reps as Riverview, i wonder if things would've changed and their current position in the competition being changed, such is for Riverview who is coming 6th i think??
There workload was minimal when you compare these schoolboys to Colts (1+ yrs older) players. GPS 1st XV + Schoolboy players would have played max 8 trial games+6 comp games. The rep season for them is over 2 separate weeks when school footy was not scheduled so no issue. Compared to 30 or so in Club (incl trials). At the extreme, by comparison, was the best 2 club and state teams' players in the U15s last year that played 53 comp games (club, state, reps, school) as well as training for 3 teams in the peak rep period!
Losing the first one or 2 matches of the comp was the issue for Kings and Riverview. After all the hype of "premiership favourites" these team's were lulled into their own hype. It seems the Kings and Riverview Aussie Schoolstars (3 & 4 respectively) thought they just had to run on and as they say "the rest is history". Also the non schoolstars ran around waiting for the stars to do their thing. Suffice-to-say the stars were just "fizzers" in believing their own hype.
Which reinforces
The REF 94 in his detailed match report "
NSW GPS: Newington win a thriller" about the dignity of the NEW team! This lads kept their minds on the job. I am sure they may have been bewildered in not getting more players into the respective rep teams but this would have reinforced the resolve to play with focus and determination.