• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

NSW AAGPS 2025

rugbyAU

Desmond Connor (43)
SHORE TEAMS vs Waverley @ Queens Park (5 April)

1st XV

1. Armati, Charlie
2. Garner, Max
3. Jarrett, Dominic
4. Sidwell, Liam
5. Stock, Anderton
6. Murdoch-Tilmouth, Harry
7. Reardon, Hugh
8. Clout, Bede
9. Greig, Oliver
10. Robertson, Tully
11. Mott, Charlie
12. d'Almeida, Oscar
13. Hawke, Noah
14. Hockey, Digby
15. Powell, Will

2nd XV

1. Green, Tom
2. Baxter, Henry
3. Hamilton, Ethan
4. Joyce, Harvey
5. Shadforth, Fin
6. Le Maitre, Braeden
7. Leahy, Tim
8. Yates, Alex
9. Strachan, Stirling
10. Quayle, Noah
11. Hamilford, Joel
12. O'Brien, Tom
13. Bremner, Jeremy
14. Maclennan, Luke
15. Keeler, Rory

3rd XV

1. Sheridan, Alfie
2. Yates, Nicholas
3. Cowdery, Ed
4. Gaden, Oliver
5. Paris, Lachlan
6. Squire, Darcy
7. Fulton, Tahli
8. Mackellar, Sam
9. Cockle, Charlie
10. Glasson, Tom
11. Shoemark, Rex
12. Brownie, Max
13. Shirley, Oscar
14. Wagstaff, Jake
15. Kierse, Tom


That looks like an under strength 1st XV side?
 

The Chairman

Phil Hardcastle (33)
@The Chairman what do u think the main issues with shore today were
Structure was pretty average. Don't think everyone knew where they needed to be.

Lots of silly errors shot themselves in the foot - Things like charged down kicks (there were minimum 5), knock ons, kicks out on the full, poor positioning in backfield allowing 50/22s

and overall Waverley were just bigger, stronger and played with more speed in attack. Shore got stunned it seems.

Not to panic stations yet. Severely undermanned team.

3s impressed me though. Very classy players.
 

Here for the advice

Peter Burge (5)
Waverley 10 was first class vs a very new combination for Shore in the backs. Tight five might need a shuffle for Shore. All the youngsters stepping up for sure will be better for a game in 1’s vs a solid Waverley team. Changes to be made for next trial to see where all are at. Great to be back on the sidelines in the sun va last years rain and cold!!!
 

View-Den

Bob McCowan (2)
Structure was pretty average. Don't think everyone knew where they needed to be.

Lots of silly errors shot themselves in the foot - Things like charged down kicks (there were minimum 5), knock ons, kicks out on the full, poor positioning in backfield allowing 50/22s

and overall Waverley were just bigger, stronger and played with more speed in attack. Shore got stunned it seems.

Not to panic stations yet. Severely undermanned team.

3s impressed me though. Very classy players.
hi @The Chairman I'm sure if you watched you would have seen if the youngster Payton Tarau played...... heard he has some razzle dazzle, any word on him
 

The Chairman

Phil Hardcastle (33)
16As were purely outsized. Nothing they could do. Same with the Firsts.

I must say though, Reardon (E) impressed me. Someone who played 16Bs crashed into the firsts and does not look out of place.
 
Top