Schmidts approach should be done at club and school levels. There is a flow on effect on bringing youngsters up. 100%
Players that come through need a certain level of body maturity/grit to continue on. I feel that toughness is gained at club level, particularly Colts not School's. - 100% Agree
Unfortunately school (GPS/CAS etc) players are restricted from playing club Y11/Y12 yet Y10s can play. Miss out on opportunity when youngsters come through into 2nds, 1sts rugby then at risk of losing to league over the next 2 years. Finish school then looks for a club who already have established Colts in position - 100% Agree - In terms of players of age missing out, its unfair and I think that is when the school need to weigh up the pros and cons. If up to me, I would not allow it. I would make it a rule in the school - Only year 11&12 can play 1st and 2nd (Yr 10 only come up for injuries etc). So what if they lose games and so what if perhaps there are talented kids in Yr 10 that could play up? They can wait their turn. First priority should be given to all Year 12 student who wants to play rugby before they finish school. If they don't win a premiership that year, its not the end of the world but those boys will finish school with fond memories. That is what I would do if I were in charge and given the authority. BUT I know schools don't want to lose games - PRIDE is a funny thing, it provides a very tunnel and short vision.
Taumoepeau exceptional talent who's old man coached at East's was with TAHs forwards coaching. Obviously given the right path and preparation - He has always been exceptional. And it is to be expected because he would have received 1-1 coaching from his dad. I would worry if was not exceptional. He is a working horse and he EARNS his sport on his own merit.
Also not a coach just outside looking in