Dustyy
Peter Burge (5)
Interesting hearing a Scot’s supporters view on the game. But two sides to every coin. The kings forwards were far more mobile and maintained the intensity throughout the game. Unfortunately for Scots they lost one of their front rowers early on which no doubt effected the plan.Here are my 2 cents on the previous round that was Scots against Kings.
Firstly would like to congratulate Kings on a stellar effort and demonstrated a masterclass in wet weather footy, playing excellent field position which essentially was the downfall of Scots. In fact their kicking game was so good that three out of their four tries were from kick chase. My first point to be made is that Scots saw the same weakness that they had against Newington, execution. I can't remember how many opportunities Scots had within Kings 22 but it was far more than kings had in theirs. Things saw to be a bit clunky in that area with miss passes, penalties conceded, and unforced errors.
My second point, although I am a strong believer of 'play the ball not the man', was the referee. Scots showed their dominance up front once again (with still in my opinion the best forward pack in the GPS) with their not so secret rolling maul. It was chaotic for Kings to defend and they had to resort to illegality in order to save their skin. One instance in particular Scots set a rolling maul on the kings side of the touchline and it picked up considerable steam, looking like it could go all the way from the 40, until a Kings player went around the side and illegally sacked a potential try. the act was left unsanctioned and a scrum to Kings. A few other instances like held up calls that looked to be clear tries, but those are 50/50.
In terms of standout players, Scots 15 very clear standout setting up a key try from a solo break resultant of strong running and sidestepping. Scots 10 again showing his ability to kick well, looking like the 'George Ford' of this Scots team with game management. Scots 6 and 7 each respectively having solid games, as well as the replacement back rower having a good impact and intensity which was much needed for Scots in the finishing third of the game. Both wingers played well with good defensive cover and kick cover, both look to have some serious pace which is handy. And it would feel wrong to leave out Scots 9, constantly having goes at the defense around the ruck keeping defenders guessing.
In conclusion I think this is nothing but a learning curve for Scots. From what I saw yesterday Zach Fittler needs more involvement. The ball in his hands in space is a serious weapon, we saw it against Barker, and now against kings. Give him the ball. potentially a move into the centres could do that for Scots, or simply making him more involved in set piece moves. A loss is a loss, but for the coaching staff and team, part of a loss is a win, because that loss shows you how to improve, which is all that matters between now and the first GPS round.
it’s always easy afterwards to criticise a ref’s decisions and only by watching a replay could one clarify some mistakes. But let me point out two fairly clear decisions that would have really changed the result (and not for the Scots side)
About 6min into the second half the Scots number 6 both late and with an elbow connected with the head of the kings 15. In the modern game would have result in a red card which wasn’t called by the linesman, nor was a red card given to the three players who took out the number 8 in the air from a kick off. So I agree play the ball not the man.
the game was a cracker and as with other members this season will be a good one to watch.