Number 7
Darby Loudon (17)
To be honest I can't see either school not being in the top grade, along with nearly all of the other GPS schools.
A divisional comp should also give the schools the added incentive to ensure their rugby program across the age groups is as strong as it can be. Which, you would think, would only improve the quality of school boy footy, and hopefully beyond.
It is not an easy thing to do,however, I believe in NZ that is how they structure their schools, into divisions, and as we well know, they are not bad at footy!
There was a couple of meetings of headmasters and Rugby heads 2-3 years ago (with some encouragement from RA) where a change to the current association format was discussed. One piece of feedback I received was that it was shot down pretty quickly by GPS headmasters as the thought of Joeys not playing View or Scots vs Kings just wasnt palatable. You're fighting 150 years of history at the moment which I dont see changing any time soon.
I personally see the current cross association trials situation a bit unedifying from the perspective that some schools treat it as exactly that (trials) whereas some clearly have their 1st XV set and turn up to win. That is, the games dont count for anything so you see some strange results.
Trials also expose another problem with the concept of grading comps by school. You get the situation where a school with depth (30+ teams) has to host two schools with less depth and you cannot level off 1sts vs 1sts, 2nds, vs 2nds etc OR they host one school and struggle to get games for their D's, E's and F's which is a real shame.
I am not down on the concept of creating better comp structures but at the moment one of the more manageable aspects of GPS is that all schools go down to at least D's or E's per age group meaning logistics are more manageable (except for Joeys who go well beyond F's which is the anomaly).